Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Latest TELEGRAMS

This Afternoon,

Judgment in Gaming Case. Wellington

The following judgment was delivered in the Gaming and Lotteries case tried this morning : The Magistrates think they must convict the defendants, and they think the facts alleged are proved, and that they are prohibited by law. They think that in cases like this persons likely to commit the prohibited act would think it prohibited by nothing but the law, and therefore the only deterrent is the money lost. That should always be sufficiently substantial to deter. In this special case they think that the eminence of the position of the defendants, and the publicity and deliberation of the act, called for the vindication of the law. The defendants would be fined £lO each. The Hon. John Johnston, who was one of the Justices on the Bench, dissented from this decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18811223.2.16

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, 23 December 1881, Page 3

Word Count
140

Latest TELEGRAMS Patea Mail, 23 December 1881, Page 3

Latest TELEGRAMS Patea Mail, 23 December 1881, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert