A QUERY.
(To the Editor of the Patea Mail.) Sm, —Can it bo because Mr Winchcomb, the valuer for the Waverley Town- Board, is a member of the Patea County Council, that no objections have been raised by the Council to the valuation list for that district ? I see in your report of the proceedings of the Council, at their meeting on slh instant, that the committee appointed to inspect the valuation lists recommend, “ that the rate roll ” (which I presume means valuation list, the committee have not been very precise in their terms) “ of the liawera (24th) Road District be objected to on the grounds that the said roll is not in the form specified in the second schedule of ‘ The Rating Act, 1877,’ &c," and that the Council adopted their report. It seems very strange that they should not have noticed (hat the valuation list for the Waverley Town District was also not upon the form specified in the said schedule, and also that the valuer had failed to sign the valuation list. Whence this thusness.—l am, &c., WAVERLEY. Feb. 10, 1879.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18790212.2.13.2
Bibliographic details
Patea Mail, Volume IV, Issue 399, 12 February 1879, Page 2
Word Count
184A QUERY. Patea Mail, Volume IV, Issue 399, 12 February 1879, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in