Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Whether or not a third party can advance money to a man’s wife and hold the husband responsible for repayment, even though he had not asked for the advances to be made, and, in fact may not have known that they were made, was a point of law that came before Mr Justice AlacGregor in the Supreme Court at Wellington. It was held that in such a case the law would hold the husband responsible for payment if the money had been advanced for the purchase of necessities.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19310630.2.206.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Otago Witness, Issue 4033, 30 June 1931, Page 51

Word count
Tapeke kupu
88

Untitled Otago Witness, Issue 4033, 30 June 1931, Page 51

Untitled Otago Witness, Issue 4033, 30 June 1931, Page 51

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert