Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Criticism of double-barrelled questions was voiced by his Honor, Mr Justice Blair, in the Supreme Court at Gisborne. Counsel in a civil action asked a witness why the Harbour Board had done a certain thing, but his Honor pointed out that the witness had not said the board had done it. “If I asked you why you murdered your grandmother last week, what would you say? ” asked his Honor. “ I didn’t.” replied counsel. “ Yes,” pointed out his Honor, “but that isn’t an answer to my question. If I had obtained an admission from you that you had murdered her, then I could ack you why you did it.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19310623.2.142

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Otago Witness, Issue 4032, 23 June 1931, Page 33

Word count
Tapeke kupu
108

Untitled Otago Witness, Issue 4032, 23 June 1931, Page 33

Untitled Otago Witness, Issue 4032, 23 June 1931, Page 33

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert