Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE EDUCATION BILL. LONDON, February 25.

.JaQr M'Kenna (President of the BoaTd cf Education), appealing for sympathy and the abandonment of partisanship, introduced a bill giving rate aid exclusively to the council type of schools; having teachers appointed without religious tests ; no State aid to voluntary schools in single school areas; and non-compulsory attendance at any voluntary schools. Parents objecting to these may choose the local authority school.. The Exchequer grant will be 47s per child at voluntary and council schools for the same standard of secular instruction. In the event of the trustees being unCible to continue they must transfer the school to the local authority, which must facilitate denominational instruction outAide school hours. \ Voluntary schools recover the right to charge fees. Mr Balfour derided the idea that bill would bring peace. It inflicted an injustice upon parents, in the country and m, gross ill-treatment on voluntary tnanagtss, And as regards the towns it de#£w>yed the great jrork commenced in 1903. Mr Asquith said no other solution was {Kwaible. - ' i The Nonconformist members of the House of Commons accorded the bill a somewhat lukewarm reception, Mr Perks suggesting reconsideration of the urban clauses. •The Nationalists are strenuously noncommittal on the measure. The Times says that the English sense ©{ justice will resent the obvious attenpt to cripple the_ Church rural schools unless they accept the proposed limited facilities of denominational teaching. February 26. The resolutions passed by the Noncon-"" fonnist and Welsh members of the House of Commons did not commit either group to an unqualified approval of Mr ' M^Kenna's Education Bill. The High Churchmen fiercely denounce it, and FatheT Vaughan, speaking at the iE^efc End, said it was altogether an im"^poseible bill, while Archbishop Bourne, at" Leeds, stated that he believed it would prove unworkable.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19080304.2.211

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Otago Witness, Issue 2817, 4 March 1908, Page 19

Word count
Tapeke kupu
296

THE EDUCATION BILL. LONDON, February 25. Otago Witness, Issue 2817, 4 March 1908, Page 19

THE EDUCATION BILL. LONDON, February 25. Otago Witness, Issue 2817, 4 March 1908, Page 19

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert