Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SAFETY ON RAILWAYS.

PREVENTION OP COLLISIONS.

INTEREST ING A I'TOM ATI ( SAFETY DEVICE.

Details of a device that claims to ensure that collisions on single-truck railways may be automatically- prevented have been received by the British Trade Commissioner at Wellington. The report indicates that ihe system is equally applicable to ordinary double track signalling apparatus, and even to terminal stations. The system,

known as the “Angus” system. i« ail electrical one. depending on the lines being in alternate sections, which may be. and usually will be. of varying lengths. Alternating current of low frequency is supplied to the sections at a pressure of not more than ten to twelve volts, and no train can run over a section not so energised, and sections are insulated from each other by an - available means.

Proof Against Drivers' Faults,

“On reaching an non-energised sc tion the locomotive sounds its whist! and a few seconds later is brought to standstill by the automatic applicatio of the brakes. To provide complet

piotectioa ,it is necessary, of course, for the signalman to be prevented from getting two trains on a single energised section. This is provided for by track circuit testing of each section just prior to energising, and is performed in a second. It is impossible for the signal to give energy to a second train to run on a section already occupied, as his test apparatus will not show the “all-clear” signal. The system appears thus to be proof against accidents due to faulty signalling, and even the simultaneous absence of attention on the part of the driver and fireman. Engines Refused to Collide, In a recent trial on a single track connected with the London. Brighton and South Coast Railway, two locomotives were repeatedly set in motion towards each other, so that, under ordinary conditions, a collision would have been inevitable.. Tho locomotives, however, on approaching were automatically stopped .showing that a collision was impossible. Among other authorities who arc- testing the system are the Metropolitan Railway of London (one of the busiest railways of the world) and the Swedish railways.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OTMAIL19220329.2.5

Bibliographic details

Otaki Mail, 29 March 1922, Page 1

Word Count
348

SAFETY ON RAILWAYS. Otaki Mail, 29 March 1922, Page 1

SAFETY ON RAILWAYS. Otaki Mail, 29 March 1922, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert