Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GUILTY BUT NO EVIDENCE

A kinema artist, an ex-officer, named | Arthur Smith (23). pleaded guilty at jl London sessions to stealing a dressing- P ease and contents, valued at £142, from £ the Regent Palace Hotel. j Prosecuting counsel: If Smith had | pleaded "not guilty" there was not J one tittle of evidence on which the jury j could have convicted. | Sir Robert Wallace agreed with counsel, and postponed sentence, with a view lo helping friends to find him employment abroad.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OTMAIL19200416.2.25

Bibliographic details

Otaki Mail, Volume XXVIII, 16 April 1920, Page 4

Word Count
80

GUILTY BUT NO EVIDENCE Otaki Mail, Volume XXVIII, 16 April 1920, Page 4

GUILTY BUT NO EVIDENCE Otaki Mail, Volume XXVIII, 16 April 1920, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert