Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

S.M. Court.

Thursday, November 28th, 1894. (Before S. A. Breach, Esq., and G. W. Gane, Esq., J.P.’s.) ? SETTING OFF CRACKERS. Arthur Carter was charged, on the information of the police, wilh setting off fireworks on the sth November in a public place. Accused pleaded guilty. Constable Twomey stated that many complaints had been made to him of the practice, and he brought the case so as to let the boys see that they must stop this practice. Dismissed with a caution, with costs 7s. UNREGISTERED DOGS. Knobbs v. King. Failing to register a dog. Defendant stated that the dog did not belong to him. J. S. Knobbs deposed that defendant had promised to pay, bnfe he should have come to his registered office and procured a collar, although he had promised to take the collar to defendant. Fined 5s and costs 7s. Knobbs v. G. Ellis. Keeping unregistered dog. Defendant pleaded not guilty. J. S. Knobbs deposed that the dog had followed defendant for the -past six months. Fined 5s and costs 7s. Knobbs v. R. Mather. Keeping unregistered dog. Fined 5s and costs 7s. Mr Knobbs applied for costs of his attendance. Allowed one-half the fine in each case. PROHIBITION ORDER. Police v. Coffey. Defendant had a prohibition order out against himself, which expired on September 18th, 1894, and this was an application for a renewal of the order. F. P. Simeon deposed that Coffey was not only doing himself an injury, but was a nuisance to other*people as w r ell when under the influence of liquor. Order renewed for 12 months. DAMAGE TO PROPERTY.

Te Whetu v. Inia. This was a charge of wilful damage to property at Parihaba. Fined 80s and costs. CIVIL CASE.

Collins v. A. Vincent, claim £2 10s. Judgment by default for amount claimed and costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OPUNT18941130.2.14

Bibliographic details

Opunake Times, Volume I, Issue 44, 30 November 1894, Page 3

Word Count
303

S.M. Court. Opunake Times, Volume I, Issue 44, 30 November 1894, Page 3

S.M. Court. Opunake Times, Volume I, Issue 44, 30 November 1894, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert