MR A. J. COOK.
•LIR THOMAS’S CRITICISM. INCAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING. "SELLING THE MINERS." (From Oob Own Correspondent.) LONDON, November 27. Speaking in his constituency at Derby this week, the Right Hon. J. H. Thomas (the railwaymen's leader) made his promised reply to the criticisms of Mr A. J. Cook (the miners’ secretary), who had accused him of “selling the miners.” Commenting on Mr Cook’s .description of his speech in the House on the Sve of the strike as despicable and grovelling, “that was true,” said Mr Thomas. “It was a grovelling speech, because I knew war was near, and I wanted peace, knowing what war meant. I make no apology for adapting myself to circumstances and for trying to create an atmosphere that would avert the crisis.” He was compelled to answer personal charges, because while he had refused to express His views, while he had refused to defend himself, it had not prevented other people deliberately going about the country and saying he had “sold the miners.” Speaking of the events leading up t» tho coal dispute, Mr Thomas gave a graphic description of the introduction of the slogan, “Not a penny off, not a minute on.” “The four miners’ leaders,” said Mr Thomas, “met ua with tho request that the General Council should agree to the slogan. That was tho day before the miners’ delegate conference. The General Council unanimously decided it could not endorse the slogan, and that decision was conveyed to Mr Cook in a letter. The next day, in spite of its refusal, the miners’ executive endorsed the slogan, and said that was to bo their policy.” THE GENERAL STRIKE. Referring to events leading up to tin. general strike, Mr Thomas made a drat matio statement on the final breaking on of negotiations. Speaking of the conferences at No. 10 Downing street, he said that about 12 o’clock on fee Sunday the Prime Minister sent for them, and said that since they met an hour before an incident had happened at the Daily Mail, where certain sections of the men had refused to put in type a leading article, and the instructions of the Cabinet were that they were immediately to break off negotiations. ' “It is hardly necessary for me to say it was a bombshell,” declared Mr Thdmas. He pointed out that the General Council by resolution repudiated'the action of the men at the Daily Mail offices, but that, when they went into the Prime Minister’s room again it was in darkness, and they were told that the whole of the Cabinet had left, including the Prime Minister. Emphasising his views on a general strike, Mr Thomas said he had not only opposed it. but had said that a general strike must fail, for the reason that the more effective the strike tho more they would starve their own people and cripple them from going on. He contended it was better for the men and women to use their commonsense at the ballot box. —(Cheers.) If a vote were taken in this country for any revolutionary methods, in his view less than 4 per cent, of the people would vote for it. AN UNWORTHY LEADER. Mr Thomas said ho had opposed a levy and an embargo on coal because he belived both were impossible. If Mr Winston Churchill’s original proposals had not been thrown over, he thought the dispute would have been settled long ago. Having reiterated that he himself had kept ,quia* during the dispute, Mr Thomas said: _ “That has not prevented abuse and misrepresentation from one who is unworthy to have had the sacrifices of such a noble body of men.—(Cheers.) After all, the great mass of the working classes of this country will not judge by words. They will judge by deeds. They will say: “Have you delivered the goods ’ When that question is asked there is only one answer: JNo, I have failed boause I was of understanding the psychology of the British Pe Mr C Thomas also said he had 45 references of an offensive character to himself made bv Mr Cook, and intimated that, he would deal with them on a future occasion. MR COOK UNREPENTANT. “I am as unrepentant to-day as I was on May 1 last. We know tho -orces we are fighting and I am more optimistic now 5 in!" said Mr Cook sppaking m London to a crowded meeting. We have learned some of the weakness of -own KTIt is not given s us to despair. We shall renew our energies, m rebuilding o« movement on the experience g „ lesson bought is one well taught.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19270111.2.110
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Otago Daily Times, Issue 19994, 11 January 1927, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
771MR A. J. COOK. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19994, 11 January 1927, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.