RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 205, 5 August 1862, Page 5

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Monday, 4ru Au.just, ISO 2.

i Before A. C. Strode, Ei;\., K.M.j

Dhl'nkknnkss.— IMer M\Mithy, Jamo* Gordon, Edward llo!wo,i, Andrew Murray, A. H. ]»arn<:tt, and John Williams were fined \>)i. each for thi< off.-ne.j. James W. CampbHl, and John i'renoh also I charged witli this <dler:<vj, were dismissal, Jirivimr been in the lock-up smut Saturday. Making a JJi.sti:ui(.vm;e. — Davi I TuvnbuU was charged oa the information of constable M*Mali:)ii. w tli having h.\!ii lighting and disorderly I iujlt-itt ray-street, on the 3rd instant. Fined 3Us. and I costs. ; Stiuuni; a Watch. — Tlioukw Puvor w.is ; (•Surged on the jinlorutati m of(i-nnre Fryer, with I having stolen uwatf'i an.l chain, tin-property cf tin; '' piaintiii: on Smii-day last. It appears the "piainti!i and the defeiida-it \v -v diggers ;i>nl li.rl i.-.{i mates tor some I ■. A-vordii:g to tin- plasutilf* staK- ! meut, th.-y liad levn drinking toother at t!t- j Shakspcaro Hotel. While there witness missed his i watch and chain, r.:nl on the emstabl" searehiii'.r iln- j defendant the watch was I'mnd upon him, hut he hid I no doubt that it was taken without any felonious | in'cnt, merely fur safe keeping. " j His Worship disiniv- >d the c.a '.. i F::i,o.vy.—James Tiiomas, who had been a;>pre- ' hended on a warrari!, issu-d hy Matthew P-ice, iw|., j It si lent Magistrate, laveivargill, wa.-; char-! d wit.'i i having- stolen good-, to tin; value of .020, of one John \ Stirl:nir. Tiic prisoner li.id laki-n a passage for Mcl- ' bourne, and was arroicd on hoard tli>; (.rothi-n'mii'tr. j His Worship remanded tht: prisoner to luvciva:1- ! li'ill for further oxainiuation. j Nuisa.vcks. — Inspector \irnoji reporti-d thfi I nuis'inc; in th.. c;:<.; of Win. Cliristii: ahated ; in the ! mattfr of Ueor^e .Crowhui-st, the nui.-.nnec was mi- ; abated. j lib Worship fined the latter V)i. nud costs. | UIVII. CASES. j Wilson v. Cramer.—No tijipearancc. Case dis-' missed. &v.v.: v. ?.I. A. Ll'C. — \o aj)pi;;iranco. Cas, j i'is!iiis.-(.d. i Curio v. Curhbcrt.—Claim for £1 :M. Jud-- I moiit fif the plaintiff, for LI "2-;. 2-\. and cists. Wil.-uji and ()ih"i>; v. Hu-;ii'.-r.—i.'l.-iha for ' L\\ lo.i. ;> 1. Jtiil.":n-ut fo;- t!;-j phiiniiii'|iy cun.-uiit, | in the stun claimed tir^-'tlii.T witii e.i.sts. * ; Isxu: an.l Anotinjr v. Thomas. —No appearance, j Case di.smi.s>('l. Jt-llivy v. Harris.—Claitn for !.•> 12s. It appear.-1 that tho (.hiiiitilf hud no ltouiiil wlmtevvr tur an action, iiiasiiuicii ;is In: had tin: def/ndant a rt-c-ji[it i:i fail, l>:d:mcin_; all claims lie had a_';i''i^l him. The piaintiii w.i-: n-jii-.in.iLtd. Corhott v. CiuhSi.TL. -Claim f»r LI lGs. Ju lenient for thu ji'aiiiti!! [<).• LI I'U. and cost-;. Lull; v. Giv.^oi1. —This c ls..' w;is iidjourned sine tiic. Isaac and AtuUiior v. Soloman.~Cl.iiin for IA 13s. No a;)ii-;irano\ C i^<: dhmis-sed. Hart and Uthcrs v. Allen. —No appjaranoo. Case di.-. missed. Cooporand Others v. F.iwcctt. -Claim for L"27.5. '.'A. Juuu!n.-nt for the piaintitf in the sum claimed, together with costs. Same v. Walker.—.Settled out of Court. j Kennedy and Another v. lieamUh. — Claim for Lt hi. Jndu'SiiL'nt for the plaintiff in the sum claimed, together with co.-Ls. A. 11. ]Jon-!asv. Same—Claim for L 3. Jud^mo.it for the plaintiir for Lo and costs. Kody v. Ilutt-jii.—Claim for LSliis. Od. Judgment for the plaintiff, for L-jIIs. fid. and co-it.j. Allen v. Kirby.--Claim for Lls 10:j.—No appearance. Case dismissed. lileukall v. Canip'aeil.—Claim for L 9 11s. No appearance. Case dismissed. Crcv. hurrit v. Dunn.—Claim fur L 2 lO'i. <kl. His Worship ;^av(i judgment for the plaintiff for LI 2s. anil costs. He suited that hi; could not admit the other item, iuasmuoii as the piaintifl'eouid not legally sue for spirits supplied, unless the ijuanrity >ol<l at one time amounted in value to more than 205.; at the same time, if the money was due, it was exceedingly disreputable in the defendant not to pay v just demand. r.'iterson and Others v. Xoling.—The summons not having heeil cilicieatiy served, tho ease was d'omis.sod. AlvLcod and Another v. Kirkpatriek.—Claim for L 2. No appearance. Case dismissed. Paterson and Another v. Sinuaouds and Another. — Claim for L 2 i. Mr. Cook appeared for the defence and prayed tiiatexeculton might he delayed till today. His Worship state I that he mu-,t allow matters to take their ordinary course, and gave judgment for the plaintitls, for L-2.J an 1 costs. Farley v. Uaird.—Settled out of Court. M'Lean v. Lambtun.—-No appearance. Cu;o dismissed. rilliet and Another v. Campbell.—Claim fo^ LS Bs. Judgment for tlie plaintiff for LG G,s. and co-is. Williams v. Ilurstlett.—(Jlaiin for L 7 Via id. Mr. Cook appeared for the defendant. Judgment for the plaintiff by coasciit, in the sum claimed together with costs. M'Cjwau v. Same.—Claim for LIT. 12s. Mr. MMJreu,or appeared for the piaintiii', and Mr. Cook for tiie defence. Judgment for the plaintiff, for Lll l-2s. and costs. The Court adjourned at two o'clock.