Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mr. Chttp.ch is an excessively sensitive | man. He should never rush into print I and personalities. It is no use Mr, Church [protesting that he did not do so. I fortunately for him, we are in a position to proclaim him as the person who sought to shelter himself behind the fictitious title of "An Elector." How impolitic of Mr. Church to tell the assembled employes of the Mail Office that he " wrote the letter five minutes after " he saw our article, and that he had " wiped out the Mail." Still we survive. But Sir. Church's "bad form" 13 all the more inexcusable because he is an old journalist. We can quite well understand that he would rather not have had his name mentioned in connection with his letter. Such an ebullition of ignorance and discreditable political dodgery is surely not a kind of thing "congenialto the writer." Had Mr Church not told us, we would not have thought that the suave and greatly respected Secretary of the Agricultural Association could have been guilty of such harsh personalities in replying to an article in which he was in no way referred to. We are never too old to learn, jnd if Mr. Church has been taught duriug the past day or two to act in future with more discretion as a newspaper correspondent, he will have no cause to regret what has transpired. We have now replied to the letter signed "John Church." With regard to Mr. Church's second letter, signed "An Elector," we would simply remark that we do not write with the idea 'of convincing such a man. It may be difficult for him to understand anything, particularly just now. When this period of excitement has passed away, and "An

Elector" feels that he has discharged his obligation, he may return to his normal mental condition, and again be amenable to etiquette and reason.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18800603.2.8

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume IV, Issue 1297, 3 June 1880, Page 2

Word Count
316

Untitled Oamaru Mail, Volume IV, Issue 1297, 3 June 1880, Page 2

Untitled Oamaru Mail, Volume IV, Issue 1297, 3 June 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert