Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR. MACKAY TO RELEASED.

[NY TELKOK.VrH, VltOM out OWN COIU(KSro.NDKNT.] + Wi;u.in<;ton, October 20. In the House of Representatives, at half-past eleven o'clock last night, Mr. Sheehan said that on Thursday ho received a petition stating certain groiindn for Mr. Mackay's release, and mentioned three grounds on which the petition wan based. It was impossible to conceal the fact that this was an assault on n member of the House. Mr. Mackay had been a personal friend both in public and private, life. The fact of his being a Justice of the Peaoe was no justification. Mr.. Mackay had on many occasions risked bin life in the public interests to have the-, law vindicated. He (Mr. Sheehan) had gone carefully through the depositions,, and had come to the conclusion that this; was a case on which the Justices' decision* should be maintained. He had consulted 1 the Crown Solicitor, and the Justices had reported on the case. He could not forget that the assault was committed withini the precincts of the House. Privileged communication between members slwuldl be protected by the House, for ill such, communications were not protected, assaults on members would become common. He was awaro that »o further good would be obtained by keeping Mr. Mackay in gaol. The House would be-, glad to hear that Mr. Mackay had been released from gaol. (Loud applause.) Mr. Hislop then rose and said that ono. part of the statement was not satisfactory. One paragraph stated that the assault was: committed under provocation and that unfounded assertions were made. Hegave that statement the most emphatic: denial. Had the Wellington newspapers fairly reported tho case, the imuchieC would not have occurred.

Mr. Sheehan, in reply, said the Cabinet had regarded the case mercifully, and had concurred in the petition to release Mr. Mackaj; (Applause.)

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18771020.2.10

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume II, Issue 461, 20 October 1877, Page 2

Word Count
302

MR. MACKAY TO RELEASED. Oamaru Mail, Volume II, Issue 461, 20 October 1877, Page 2

MR. MACKAY TO RELEASED. Oamaru Mail, Volume II, Issue 461, 20 October 1877, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert