Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BILLS OF SALE.

▲ molt important decision respecting tha value of bills of sale has been given in the Supreme Court, Sydn-jy, by the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Hargrave. and Mr. Justice Faucett. Heretofore (says the Sydney Morning Herald) it has too often b««n the practice of persons in difficulties to go to a money-lender, behind the backs of their creditors, and obtain loans at exorbitant rates of interest, to enable them to carry on business. The better to conceal the transaction, the bill of sale is not registered, as that was not required by lair, within 30 days, and for this non-re-giatration the borrower sometimes pays a fee. But before the expiration of that period of time the document is renewed, always with advantage to the moneylender and to the loss of the unfortunate borrower, or rather of his more unfortunate creditor. This goes on, it may be, from month to month, until, when the borrower is about to collapse, the lender Mgisters his bill of sale, comes in and takes possession of the property over whieh it. is given, and the other unfortunate creditors are left to whistle for their money. The, effect of this state of things is simply, to iallow a businessman, in insolvent circumstances, too hopeful of retrieving his fortunes—for what business returns a profit equal to the interest which la charged for a loan under such circumstances?—to denude himself of everything before going into the Court with a mountain of liabilities. The decision of the full Court the other day will check this

by Carroll and Johnson, insolvents, over j their stock-in-trade in Hunter-street, was really given for past debt, ancl therefore had the effect of preferring Cohen to the other creditors of the insolvents —a preference, it may be remarked, that is not allowed by law. Mr. Cohen will therefore have to give up the proceeds of the goods which he sold, and come in and take his dividend with other creditors.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18770507.2.14

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 323, 7 May 1877, Page 4

Word Count
328

BILLS OF SALE. Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 323, 7 May 1877, Page 4

BILLS OF SALE. Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 323, 7 May 1877, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert