The Case of A Suitcase

NZ Truth, Issue 1211, 14 February 1929, Page 7

The Case of A Suitcase

(From "N.Z. Truth's" Sped* TWO men, both drunk, m possession of one suitcase (stolen); two denials of theft (disbelieved); two fines (£5. each). It was a difficult case, according to counsel, but Mr. McKean, S.M., Boon overcame the difficulty, and Joseph John Hewitt and George. William Bird had to face the music. Mr. King: This is a difficult ease, your worship. I am appearing for both accused, and there is no doubt that the case was found m their possession. The question Is "which one took the case?"

J Auckland Representative). S v ub- Inspector McCarthy: There is no difficulty as to which one it was. Perhaps you haven't heard all the evidence. And that is what was given by two constables; with the result that Bird, although he denied stealing the case, was held to be a party to the theft. Counsel made a plea on behalf of the wives of the accused, but the S.M. cut him short with: "Oh, yes, they are always very thoughtful of their wives when they are going to be convicted. Each will be fined £5 or twentyone days."

Smith was remanded for sentence,