Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Alwkys In Debt

thoug-h defendant had tried hard to get away alone. The climax of their disagreements came on October 7 last, when, after abusing his wife, Patterson told his father-in-law that he was "Too good for his daughter." Two. days before the court proceedings, defendant had come to witness' father's place, where she was now living, and acted like a "madman." "Do you go to races?" asked defending counsel, m commencing a lengthy cross-examination. Complainant replied that she did not, nor did she drink, as she. did not believe m either habits. Counsel: You are a prohibitionist, I suppose? — Yes. Do you suggest that you are entirely blameless? Have you been an., ideal wife? — We all have our faults. How often has your husband come home the worse for drink? — About four times a week. Has not the -whole trouble been through religion?— No. Didn't you absolutely get your husband fed up with religious stuff? — No. How many nights a week do you spend a<t the church? — One night. "Witness admittedthat she was closely connected with various branches of church- work, but not to the extent that it occupied four nights a week of her time. Counsel: Do you know this young fellow White — by the way, he's no relation of mme — he belongs to the Green Island sect, doesn't he?— Yes. How many times has White come back with you from these meetings? — Not so very often. My husband knows. During the last four months, how often — twenty or fifty times? — No. Not nearly twenty. Isn't it a fact that he has stayed at your home until nearly midnight?— No. Ten or half -past would be the latest. Witness could not affirm counsel's suggestion that Patterson had handed her £5 each week from his wages. Counsel: Why did you get him to mortgage the section for £30 ? — I didn't get him to mortgage it. The reason was because he was taking bets for a bookmaker and a man gave him three pounds to put on a horse, but he kept the money and the horse won ... It cost him thirty-two pounds. • Are you m debt ?— Yes. We have been m debt ever since we were married. Then why did you not pay your debts out of the' £60 you had saved up? That was a very dishonest thing for a Christian lady to do?— I did pay off a bit on each, but if. I'd had any brains I should have paid them all.

home and discuss Biblical matters with her? — Yes, sometimes. How often?— ' Once a week, perhaps. Did you ever stay until midnight ?-rNO. You usually stayed pretty late? — I did not. And you noticed this man trying to restrain his temper? — It appeared so, yes. Would you be surprised to know that you are cited as the sole reason of this trouble? — He spoke to me once that I was the cause of inducing his wife into the church work. Why did you have to see Mrs. Patterson once, a week?— Well, ther§ are certain matters a superintendent could see the secretary about without calling a meeting. Did you have prayer meetings there? — No. • Did you have a discussion on Bible matters when you had lunch with her to-day? — No. To Lawyer Barnett, witness stated that Patterson had once asked him if he wanted his wife. Counsel: And what did you say? — I said that by the help of God I would never have anything to do with a woman who had a husband walking this earth. Simeon George Griffith, pastor and land agent, said he had been interested m the Patterson couple for the reason that he had administered the marriage rites for them. - About three months ago, witness had been asked to interview the young couple with a view to "patching things up." "The result of the interview was that Mr. Patterson acknowledged that he had been treating his wife ' m an unfair fashion, and that he had once pushed her behind . the door with his foot." In announcing that Patterson denied the allegations laid before the court, Lawyer White referred to him as "A Daniel m a Den of Wowsers." Furthermore, his client was strongly opposed to a separation order on the grounds that .five adults and two children (which'included his wife andfamily), were now living' -in a dwelling which had only one bedroom. Patterson told the -court that he had earned over £500 m 19 months, but since August of last year he had earned only £4 a week. . Of the first £30 loan, witness had spent £10 on races,- and had no idea of what his wife had done with the balance. ' , The second loan money he had handed to his wife to pay off their debts, but it bad all gone m clothes. There

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19281213.2.15.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

NZ Truth, Issue 1202, 13 December 1928, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
805

Alwkys In Debt NZ Truth, Issue 1202, 13 December 1928, Page 5

Alwkys In Debt NZ Truth, Issue 1202, 13 December 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert