Absolutely Void
1'- j ,H Q;: My wife signed an order I| J| fortwo paintings.of photographs || || for £4/4/-, the order containing |l {!-. the us'^ual stipulation that the ll wl ;pri Ce{ do«is not include frame, If - 'bur that the company was to U 1. de|iver m a suitable frame "S| which the purchaser may pur- -f §i chase, etc. Am T bound?— i| §| "E.A.C." (Wellington). J '|| II A.: The order is absolutely |I II void as not cbmplying with the ii ||. Mercantile Law Act. As is the || i|; practice you wiil find that ah II || extortionate price will be de- II || manded for the frame and every ii || effort made to intimidate you fl || into paying. " Refuse delivery Ji ii and you will find the concern: 11 || will not sue not only Because H |f they Have no case, but because II If publicity would not suit them. II |i ' II
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19281115.2.129
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
NZ Truth, Issue 1198, 15 November 1928, Page 22
Word count
Tapeke kupu
151Absolutely Void NZ Truth, Issue 1198, 15 November 1928, Page 22
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Log in