Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MUST ENCOURAGE CRIME

Favored Postal Thief Hidden By Curtain of Suppression

. (Prom "N.Z. Truth' 3" Special Dunedin Representative.) The Post and Telegraph Department exists under a voluminous code of rules and regulations.

MANY are needless and . irksome, tending to decrease efficiency rather than promote it, yet the door is being left open m some directions to fraudulent practice. It is only by the infliction of a penalty sufficiently severe, to aqt as a deterrent that the department can suppress any attempt at crime by those of its officers who betray their positions of trust. A recent ■ decision of Magistrate H. W. Bundle, m the Dunedin Police Court, "will m no way assist the departmental officers m their efforts to cope with those wayward members of the service, even though they be a very small minority. It is not so very long ago that public confidence m the service was shaken by the disconcerting frequency of charges, against dishonest officers. '; When the offenders, however, are permitted to shelter behind the cloak of anonymity, through the farcical and much-abused system of name suppression, it not only cultivates an atmosphere of mistrust and suspicion among the public, but it must also tend to encourage dishonesty m the service. In the case under review, a young postal officer, barely 18 years, of age, was charged, on two counts with stealing- 30 shillings, the property of the Postmaster-General, and with fraudulently fixing upon a postal packet a one-shilling, stamp which had already been used. Chief -detective D. Cameron's outline of the facts disclosed, a clever scheme adopted by the accused^ to defraud the department.' During two periods of the day, the accused, a smartly-dressed youth who appeared, to have wanted for nothing, relieved at the parcels counter m the Dunedin post office. His method of theft was to. affix used stamps to parcels he-received from the public for transmission and to pocket the equivalent m money. . But i what was the ' motive for the dishonesty? No- heartrending tale, ; this, 'of hungry and iil-clad children or parents to be provided for. I This young thief was merely a raem- -.. / '

ber of the hip -flask brigade and stole the money to buy, whisky, so that he could hold his place m a gang of local sheiks. Their hobby it was to get m a merry mood each Saturday afternoon and air night to evade the ' doorkeeper of a weekly dance club with the flasks , m their possession. The accused met his friends through his piano-playing ability and was threatened with expulsion from their circle if he did hot appear weekly, packing a flask of the potent spirit. , In cases where people are driv-fi. to spasmodic theft through desperation, the court is sometimes inclined to take a lenient view, but the provisions of probation and the suppression of names were never intended to apply to those engaged m premeditated and systematic theft. ' Publicity has long been regarded as a deterrent to crime — tb earn the reprobation of one's fellows is a greater penalty than a long term of probation. The accused has lost his position and Lawyer J. P. Ward, m the course of an 'eloquent appeal, stated that his father would take him back home to Central Otago and teach him a trade if the court felt disposed to take a lenient view of the case. ■ Counsel also suggested that m view of accused's age, the court -might treat him as a juvenile. Hearken unto Magistrate Bundle: "I do not propose to deal with a.gcused ' as a juvenile, considering the nature of the charge, for it is a serious thing ■] when a young man m a position of trust does not. carry- out his duties." ' The accused was convicted and admitted to probation* for two years' on ' the charge of theft. A conviction was entered 021 the other charge. .- J Restitution was ordered and the ac- : cused was prohibited from drinking. By his decision, Magistrate Bundle ' has cast the shadow of suspicion on the members of the Dunedin post .and ' telegraph staff, while the leniency, extended to this young fraud must tend to cultivate, rather than check, dis- ! honesty m such branches of the civil service where permanent supervision ' is a practical 'impossibility. ''

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19280705.2.54

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

NZ Truth, Issue 1179, 5 July 1928, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
706

MUST ENCOURAGE CRIME NZ Truth, Issue 1179, 5 July 1928, Page 9

MUST ENCOURAGE CRIME NZ Truth, Issue 1179, 5 July 1928, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert