Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INTERPRETING RULES.

A. news item states that Manager McC.arey, the fight promoter of Los t Angeles, is trying to bring about a general meeting qf club managers and promoters to revise the different classes and weights, says a New York writer. It is about time that something of that kind was done, and while they are about it, they should Eigree upon a universal interpretation of the rules. Every club takes it upon itself to say how the men shall break and whether or not they may. fight m clinches. The fight fans are the pnes who should be .considered, as they are the ones , who pay their money at the gate and thereby keep the game alive. It has been proved p. thousand times that they prefer isfe ! clean style of fightin?. and not the "•hit-and-clinch" ...brand that • some fighters favor so much. With "clean" hitting there ■is none of. that sickening pulling and grabbing about 'that so thoroughly disgusts the spectators; The rules say clearly and distinctly : "No wrestling -or . hurling allowed-" and they should be enforced, no matter whose corns are stepped upon. With no clinching, a fight is, bound to be clean and fair, and at the same time a hundred times more interesting. A fight of such a description is never hissed or hooted at, while the bouts that are replete with wrestling rmd dragcin.o; are.. Terry McGovern, Tommy Ryan,., Joe -Gans .and fighters of that ilk box cleanly, and those wwoh o do not should -be made to do so or be disqualified. ;.' , '> . . The weight question als 0 is of vast importance and. should be gone over carefully. A contest between champions that might- give promise of being close and interesting can be easily spoiled by the weight conditions. The Gans-Nelson bout proved that the club should have something to say m regard to the weight and the time of weighing m. It has been pointed out m these columns many times that ring-side weighing m is not Jair, and even if the fighters themselves agree to it, the clubs should not. stand for it under any circumstances. When a boxer has to run, work, abstain from food and water, and practically sweat himself out -to the vejcy minute of entering the ring, he is not m condition to do himself justice, or put up a fight that will please the spectators. A limit . should be placed upon weighing time, and no.club, under any imaginable conditions, . should permit the' men to weigh later than four pr ppssibly six hours before tha bell. With a content scheduled for 10 O'clock, and the boxers weighing at 4, it would give them a. chance to eat a good meal, take a little mild exercise and a napi After this they could get a little fresh air, a good rubdown, and when it came to time for action, they would be lite racehorses. bo^er is;tsc3ta-wnyr-<weaJi,vjßnd has-; an empty stomach, he naturally is cross and out of sorts. In that condition he is liable to give vent to his temper', especially if there is any personal' feeling m the figlit, and be is mpre inclined to fight roughly and foully than if he were strong and m good spirits. The move of Manager McCarey is a commendable one, an 4 he should not let it peter but. Its success -would prove a benefit to every one connected or identified with boxing. The Grans-Nelson contest is not the only bout wherein the . weight conditions proved harmful. The Terry McGov-ern-Frank Erne "bout at the Garden was another of the many that could jbe cited. We were with Erne the afternoon of the contest on tbe -top floor of- -the Hotel Bartholdi. There was a tin roof, and the heat was unbearable. He was drawn down so fine one, could count his ribs. He didn't dare eat or drink, and, as a consequence, blew up m the first quarter. He started well, -and" that is as far as be got.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19061215.2.11

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 78, 15 December 1906, Page 2

Word Count
668

INTERPRETING RULES. NZ Truth, Issue 78, 15 December 1906, Page 2

INTERPRETING RULES. NZ Truth, Issue 78, 15 December 1906, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert