STATE EMPLOYMENT
PREFERENCE TO SOLDIERS. ADVOCATED BY RETURNED MEN. The right of returned soldiers wfec> have sustained physical disabilities by reason of their services abroad to favourable consideration for employment under the Crown has been advocated by local associations for some time, uiid as a consequence, several remits dealing with the matter were forwarded to the annual conference of delegates of the New Zealand Returned Soldiers' Association. ■ These were referred to the repatriation committee, which came to the conclusion that many soldiers have been refused re-employment by the State on account of war injuries. It therefore urged conference to place before the Government its views:—
1. (a) That employment at a wage comparable to what they would have been receiving had they npt enlisted, should be found for them, and should resume- their positions in the samo way as if leave had been grantedthem.
(h) That a separate superannuation hind, subsidised by the. Government, he established in order to remove any difficulties in connection with superam nuation.
(c) That no soldier so re-employed shall lose, by reason of war service, any annual increment to which be would otherwise hare been entitled. 3. That this association _ demands preference for returned soldiers, sailors, and nurses when public appointments are made, and recommends that preference be given by • private employers also. Mr C. W. Batten said that the committee had made their recommendations in respect of “all tho State services” because a quibble had been set uu by the powers that be that the Railway' Department was not under the control of the Public Service Commissioners. ( '‘We are not asking the Public Service Commissioners to exceed the powers conferred on them, hut to exercise those powers, - ’ said Mr T. Hong (Tti Aroha). ‘‘l know of instances where applications by returned soldiers, and competent men at that, hare beer turned down in favour of those sub- v mitted. bt- outsiders.’- The association did not want the Government to employ incompetents, hut it wanted sonu consideration accorded returned do tails who had suffered physical disabilities by reason of their services abroad. A sympathetic interpretation of the regulations should -be insisted
on. • J , The recommendations were adopted,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19200604.2.28
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 10607, 4 June 1920, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
361STATE EMPLOYMENT New Zealand Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 10607, 4 June 1920, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.