Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL CASES

AUSTRALIAN APPLICATIONS. LONDON, February 19. ' In the case the King versus the Adelaide Steamship Company, special leave to appeal to the Privy Council was granted. The hearing was fixed for early next terrain the case Gordon versus the Colonial Sugar Refining Company, a petition to rescind an order granting special leave to appeal, was postponed for a week in order to ascertain definitely whether the Royal Commission on Sugar had delivered its final report. In the case McLaughlin versus the City Bank, Sydney, special leave to appeal was granted with regard to the order of 1912, but leave was refused with regard to an order of 1909, which their Lordships considered final. -

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19130221.2.66

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8360, 21 February 1913, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
114

APPEAL CASES New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8360, 21 February 1913, Page 8

APPEAL CASES New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8360, 21 February 1913, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert