Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LETTER-CARRIERS

OFFICIAL reply to complaints. On the wuyect of icster-oameia' complaints, the onief’ Postmaster, Mr A. P. jryden, stated in an interview yesterday mat ha had been a month in VVeUingtun, and yet he had not neard a, whisper at complaint or aissatistaction on tire part ot me letter-camois’ stall. lie aad already taken steps to inquire into tne alleged grievances referred to, and nis inquiries had led him to believe mat tue complaints that had appeared, in .the press were the outcome ox possibly one or two irresponsible members of the staff, who would probably be dissatisfied no matter what was done for them. The hours of attendance varied, of course. On some days they would be heavy—when English and other heavy mails came in and left —but on the average the hours were by no means excessive. Of that ho was satisfied. Moreover, the men accepted employment well knowing that the conditions of employment implied irregular hours of attendance. If, on inquiry, it appeared that an injustice was being done to aiiy individual member of the staff it would bo remedied if the person concerned made complaint to the Department in the usual way. He would be in a better position ,in the course of a few days to speak authoritatively on the whole question of the grievances alleged. lie would gn into the whole thing, and if it appealed that any on© was being unfairly treated it would be remedied. ‘‘The staff, as a whole. I am convinced.” he said, “ia net dissatisfied. Any letter-carrier or other officer is at perfect liberty to make any statement he likes, and l.e is under no’ disability at all in consequence of having done so." Regarding the uniforms. Mr IY , A. Morris, secretary, .said that there "'ere men who objected to wearing uniforms, but the Department had. tor very rood and sufficient reasons, decided that uniforms should be worn by letter-carriers. The advantages to the service and to the men themselves were unquestionable. That being so, the best cut. pattom, and material wore obtained, and there was really no complaint mad- to the ment by the men as a whole or individually in this matter. Any complaint would, as it always bad been, receive attention, and if possible be remedied.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19130213.2.92

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8353, 13 February 1913, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

LETTER-CARRIERS New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8353, 13 February 1913, Page 9

LETTER-CARRIERS New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8353, 13 February 1913, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert