Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IN BAD COMPANY

Attempts are being made in some directions to deny that the self-styled Reform Government and the large landowners have anything in common. It is protested with great noise and circumstance that the Masseyites are not the friends of the squatters and that Masseyism, or “Reform,” is really out for closer settlement by smashing up the big estates. In proof, the “increase” in the graduated land tax schedule is pointed to with confidence, as well as the fact that there is not one solitary squatter in the Government. To all of which we answer, “Fudge.” No greater fake has been put upon the community by the most embarrassed Ministry that ever sat in New Zealand than the Massey-Alien graduated land tax, coupled with the watering down of the valuation system. The taxation scheme is purely a shop-window dodge, and is certainly not designed to cause the great land monopolists any sleepless nights. Xu fact, the rate of increase, is actually less on big estates than on those of small or moderate value. We may begin to believe in the Government’s alleged lack of sympathy with squatterdom when it ceases to take its policy from the squatters’ organ, or when Ministers no longer keep company with the great landholders. When there is a substantial increase in the actual sum yielded to the State by way of graduated land tax or else an appreciable lessening of the present acute land huuger friends of “Reform” may revive their story of Masseyism versus Squatterdom. For the present, Ministers are very likely to he judged by their associations and history, A party that gives honoured places in its ranks—if not portfolios—to gentlemen like Mr George Hunter and Mr H. M. Campbell, and selects the member for Wairarapa for titular distinction, can only rid itself of the stigma of squatterdom by passing through the grim ordeal of experience and test. If Mr Massey and his colleagues aro not in svmpathv with the land monopolists they should quit their company and dispense with their tutelage.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19130211.2.29

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8351, 11 February 1913, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
340

IN BAD COMPANY New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8351, 11 February 1913, Page 6

IN BAD COMPANY New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8351, 11 February 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert