DISTRICT COURT.
Fbidat, April 18. (Before his Honor Judge Mansford.) BLACK V. J. 0. EITCHIE.
This was an action to recover £99 175., for a buggy and harness supplied by the plaintiff, a coach builder, residing in Wellington, to defendant, a settler in Palmerston North. Mr. Forwood appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. Stafford for the defendant. The plaint set forth was that the defendant ordered a buggy and harness, which were Jo be sent to him at Palmerston. After arriving there defendant refused to take delivery of them.
The defence was, that the articles as sent were never ordered. Defendant admitted that he had ordered a buggy, but of a totally different description to the one sent him by plaintiff. The one sent was altogether useless to him, .... Plaintiff produced his books, show.ng the entries made when the order was given. According to the entries the buggy sent was the same as that described. Mr. Mansford gave judgment for plaintiff for the amount claimed and coats. Notice of appeal was given by Mr. Stafford. The remainder of the cases which were set down for hearing wore postponed for a fortnight, _____________
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18790419.2.20
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5633, 19 April 1879, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
190DISTRICT COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5633, 19 April 1879, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in