Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISTRICT COURT.

Friday, March 21. (Before his Honor Judge Mansford.) W. W. JOHNSTON AND O. JOHNSTON V. JOSEPH AMES. Claim, £156. —Mr. Bell appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Edwards for the defendant. This was an action for rent in connection with the Star Hotel. Mr. Bell said it would be unnecessary to call any evidence. 'I he claim was for rent due on the 21st December last. Letters have been received in which the defendant admits the -deed of the lease, and that the rent is due. No witnesses would therefore be necessary to prove those facts. He apprehended the only question for his Honor to decide would be whether the rent due last December was„recoverable with the interest. ■ Mr. Edwards said he would have to call evidence to show the amount of damages. His Honor observed that the only matter he had to decide was a small amount of £2 3s. 6d. Mr. Edwards said he would call defendant to show only the rent was not paid, in order that his Honor might assess the damages. Joseph Ames, the defendant, deposed that he was formerly landlord of the Star Hotel. He disposed of his interest in the hotel to Mr. Beatty on the 2nd December. The rent fell due on the 21st December. No application had been made to him on this occasion for the rent. The plaintiff knew that witness had parted with his interest in the hotel. There was furniture in the hotel that could have been assessed, but he believed there was a bill ° f By Ml Bell : Mr. Krull holds the bill of sale, so that distress would take Krull’a security. His Honor thought the debt was dap on the 21st, and would give judgment for plaintiff for £156, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent, from the 21st December, with costs. " M. McCredie v. J. M. Edmonds.—Claim £lll 3s. 6d. Mr. Edwards appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Gordon Allan, instructed by Mr. Lewis, for tho defendant. This was an action to recover the above amount as balance of account for goods sold and delivered. Defendant had paid £27 19s. into Court, but disputed the balance. The case was a very complicated one, the hearing of which occupied the greater part of the day. His Honor reserved judgment until next morning (Saturday.)

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18790322.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5610, 22 March 1879, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
391

DISTRICT COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5610, 22 March 1879, Page 3

DISTRICT COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5610, 22 March 1879, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert