Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Wednesday, November 7. (Before H. S. Wardell, Esq., R.M.) FORGERY OF A MONEY-ORDER. Arthur Barnsley, charged ou remand with forging a telegraph money-order for £lO on the°2sth of May last, was committed for trial at the next sittings of the Supreme Court. Mr. Fitzgerald, who appeared for the prisoner, applied for bail, which was granted in two sureties of £IOO each, and the accused himself in £2OO. Up to the time of the rising of the Court the requisite sureties had not been procured. CIVIL OASES. Styles v. Jeffreys.—Mr. Izard for the plaintiff, and Mr. Buckley for the defendant. This was an action to recover possession of a dray and harness, which plaintiff alleged he had purchased from one Johnson in February last, the use of which he afterwards allowed ■ to Johnson at a weekly rental. It appeared that Johnson afterwards sold the dray to the defendant. After a lengthy hearing of the case, his Worship expressed himself of opinion that the evidence was not sufficiently strong to prove the sale of the dray by Johnson to plaintiff, and he therefore gave a verdict for the defendant, with costs. Blake v. Mulligan.—This was an action brought to recover damages for an assault committed by Mrs. Mulligan upon Mrs. Blake on the 22nd ‘September last. Mr. Fitzherbert appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. Allan for defendant. Hester Blake, wife of William Blake, deposed that at about half-past nine on the evening in question she went into Mulligan s shop to get a brooch mended. Mrs. Mulligan was there, and she appeared to be tipsy. Mrs. Mulligan asked her if she could not mend it herself. Witness replied that perhaps she could if she had the stuff. • Mrs. Mulligan then went into a backroom, and on returning told the witness to clear out. She appeared very excited, and came round the shop to strike her. Mr. Mulligan then roughly shoved witness out of the shop, and when just outside, Mrs. Mulligan struck her a blow on the eye. She endeavored to follow witness out, but Mr. Mulligan held her back. She was struggling to get at witness. A great deal of evidence was taken, and the Court gave judgment for plaintiff for £3 damages and costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18771108.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5189, 8 November 1877, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
376

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5189, 8 November 1877, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5189, 8 November 1877, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert