Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Mr. HlSLor, M.H.R., has complained that some reports of the recent fracas between Mr. Mackay and himself were not truthful. From a perusal of recent files it appears that some people, writing apparently in his interest, have telegraphed some most mendacious accounts of the affair to Northern and .Southern journals. We take the following, which appears under the heading “Scan. Mag. and Horsewhipping,” from the Otago Daily Times of the 15th inst.; —By telegraph.—From our own correspondent.—Wellington, October 13.—A fracas occurred in the street this afternoon between Mr. James Mackay, of the Thames, and Mr. Hislop, M.H.R. It seems that the former complained of the latter having circulated or repeated a statement that Mr. Mackay had assisted in making drunk the member who was looked out and rescued on the night of the division, regarding which matter Dr. Henry made an absurd statement in the House last night, Mr. Mackay demanded an apology from Mr. Hislop, and some angry correspondence took place, the result being that Mr. Mackay attempted to horsewhip Mr. Hislop in the street this afternoon, and there was a great row. Mr. Hislop showed great pluck, he seized the whip and broke it, but the two were then separated by friends.—From a correspondent.—One of the results of the defeat of the Government took place this afternoon in the public street, by an attempted assault by one James Mackay, of 'Thames fame, known as an employe of the Native Hand Purchase department, upon one of our southern legislators, who, instead of receiving the intended thrashing, gave Mr. Mackay a severe shake, and Mr. Mackay was glad to be let go, and beat a hasty retreat amidst the jeers of the assembled crowd.” Will Mr. Hislop, or anyone who witnessed the occurrence, say. that the above is a truthful statement of the occurrence. If it is, the witnesses in the case at the Police Court—Hislop V. Mackay—must have perjured themselves considerably, which nobody supposes they did.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18771022.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5174, 22 October 1877, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
327

Untitled New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5174, 22 October 1877, Page 2

Untitled New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5174, 22 October 1877, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert