The Evening Post in its pai’agraph referring to tho Wharf Committee meeting yesterday, erred in saying “ a number of statements were put in signed by various masters of local trading vessels to the effect that they had been offered bonuses by Mr. Reeves to discharge at Plimmer’s wharf instead of at the Queen’s wharf.” There arc also one or two slight mistakes in other portions of the paragraph, which may be accounted foi by the fact that very probably the paragraph was in type before or shortly after the meeting commenced —a little after 3 o’clock. In connection with this subject we are of opinion that a mistake was made in excluding the reporters from the meeting during the hearing of the petition against Mr. Reeves. It would have been much more fair both to Mr. Reeves and the public that the whole of the proceedings should have been made public. As will be seen by our report, the reporters were permitted to be present during a portion of the time, and our representative was afterwards furnished with the correspondence laid before the meeting in reference to the subject under discussion. That correspondence, together with the result of the committee’s investigation, will be found in another column.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18770419.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5014, 19 April 1877, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
207Untitled New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 5014, 19 April 1877, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.