LONDON TOWN TALK.
(From the Argus correspondent.)
I have as yet seen in no London paper the very best bon-mot I have ever heard upon a public matter. How did it happen; that the late Arctic Expedition came to misa the North Pole ? Because those on the Discovery were not on the Alert. ' Nothing, by-the-bye, has excited more public indignation against Mr. Ward Hunt than his rumored conduct towards the Arctic captains.' I say rumbredy because I have not seen it contradicted, and because it is-characteristic-;enough to-be true. He is said t’b have reprimanded them for pbming up to' toivn 1 without' reporting themselves, and to have- sent them'b'aok to their ships at Spithead.;’Nowi’thoughlthis may have lain within the strict lines of his duty, every man with anintelligence beyond that of a common policeihan would have avoided under the circumstances exercising such an act of authority. Moreover, in his case, it ‘is - especially • “ bad form,” since no man has made more mistakes, for coat the country so much, as Mr. Ward Hunt—not, indeed, by leavihg'his post, but by stbpping'in it. I ‘ ' •; : The - Case of accusedjof throwing.lus wife over the Stelvio Pass Has become J a J ßubject ot much public,’ interest. ‘ The. whole ‘story ,was common talk enough this| autumn among tourists in that district whoj had returned to [England, long before any legalprocsedingswefe .taken. And that the law’ was. 'put'irimbiibn In the matter' was owing, T'am; informed, to a well-known novelist, who being 'on the spot—and having perhaps a professional, feeling' for ' the romance of the adventurecaused the affair to be taken up. Of course it ;is -freely‘stated.’that , this is not the first wife •'this accused 'hM/tre»ted.in. a, similar (manner. One would imagine, indeed, to hear •some folks, talk, that he had marie a practicp pf (pushing wive? dowu-mountain.passes' every long vana-' tio>| (for beds a barrister) but j belijeve thatit fs reaUytru® thdtjin addition to this present “ unpleasantness 11 he had the misfortunc to shoot his naothar-in-law, with,a' revolvet-j-quite accidentally.' The.revolver web* °®> (and the' old lady happened to, be within/range ; that; is really all, and even if;it was/pot altogether aimless, she wan.his mother-in-law, and some, temptations are irresistible.,‘ J Talking of shooting, a Jew has shot] another. Jew at Ramsgate,'and -a Hebrew gentlemaif writes to the papers tbpay that suchj a_ thing has never .before: been heard, off A Jiew may have killed a Gentile or'frvyo, ages ago, he says,. but for 200 years np.rHebjewr.has ever suf-; fered in England -on_a-capital-charge; I bah only say that if <thid fid so, the Jews—(judging from 1 my own ipbrsbrial acquaintance! of them] —must have bad.great .luck. ■ ’Lately) L'savvy 1 one“ 8.L.” wrote that he though tit “highly un ; desirable ” that the Jews should'be considered better, than other people, .and pointed put that r; it was only twelve years, instead' of 200, since one;Mr. Levy, a Jew, was hung! in ydur .part. of the world,; >namely,: at'iNelson, in yNew, Zealand—for ; helping’; to■ murder “between' twenty arid thirty people’”—a very crfedl&Jilr. endeavor, it must be-confessed, upon his part to “ restore the ayyrage.” ’ ■ t*:-M _ j It is extraordinary how'people! besides,thofee' in; want; of: money still contrive to interest; themselves in the chosen face. In a Ipte will! case’iirDubliri a lady is proved tofH'ave'speqt vast sums in T ‘f facilitating the return] of ‘the* Jews td.Balestine.” . H6'w, shC‘did-this, 1 except by paying:their;fares thither, 'ls'not] stated/ She - spent much- of -her “ time- inr copying' the four Gospels in '’[needlework/ and an. Italian duplicate of them, to ihave been German,' - ’since' ‘ ! it Wari* in Berlin wool. Believing' also >that after, the resurrection the Just would be without clothes,. she employed herself in making garments]fbr them —but all of a Lilliputian size—to enable [ them to make a decent ; appearance in public. In the case of .this ladyis>will a compromise' has been effected, the jury, thinking it i.n'piJen. question whether she wias mad or not. I, need not add thatit wasanflrish 'one. J „ Some curious incidents;'have recertly ‘.ocf---curred in our competitive 'examinations There 1 is a gentlemamcadel a,t Woolwich, who, though only sixteen, and the’ youngest in hit batch, has passed 3000 -marks:'ahead of any" other competitor y hut Kerisjso'shbrt of statv ire .that’ the authorities .can ,only, allow of his admittance upofi his ’ solemn .promise to i grow. He actually; Obtained the full-number of marks] that it r was: possible to get J inobligatory ■mathematics.”;;::'.';'; ;[ '■"'[ [[’ [”T”.[ - I ! . Because I;hare no love fori the r Turks, I do not therefore Wjsh it tb be believed that I have any high .opinion of the .[Russians. The late, trial of i'Dri Stronsberg—whose liljp Is a romance of- commerce 1 hot 'second in interest and splendor to that of John Law himself—proves hew barbarous is-that nation; which is in the habit of calling herself “ hblyi” The cburi.sel for the Grown demanded a conviction •tapbri%b' : grblmd that.Strpusberg was a Ger-J ’man,-and had been » Jew, and the jmy .found; every Q«Si&& flftkmer guilty, and afrufttftl ifc .is fair ta a®; that the Emperor,.hwj; mit|g»tea- the,, verdict sb far.as “tb sencl’Stroush'efg out of country, Instead’ lpf' «UU
stands-revealed*--To.'Bhow .the; contrast between; a civilised.and savage: country, we had an lEngliSh Judge-recently-sentencing a foreigner, to half.his due<amountef imprisonment, ;with the remark, " Had you been an Englishman, I should have punished you twice as much." He may have been wrong (I think he was), but he certainly erred on the right side;; As for a " mixed jury," I suppose the jßussians could no more realise such an institution ;than they could imagine an official who didn't take bribes ! --- \ ■'. '"■ It must not be supposed that all the failures of our diplomatic system: take" place; at Constantinople. In a certain,capital nearer homethough still not so very near—there ip an ambassador with a temper.; To :call him hasty is to use a.vpry moderate, expression j indeed ; only'to counterbalance this he' has an attache who is /as .cool., as.' a : On a: certain important, occasion this young gentleman was sent, for'„ by hjs chief,' and directed 'to " start ; for ' England l on , a critical; errand.' : ".Very: good, sir; how am I to go ?". " Go,? , Walk if you like ;' what do I care?"' It'was'not atime to discuss a quesspecial trains,.aiid .besides that was a subject for another department. The cool young man took six weeks to' reach; what is called is diplomatic jargon.'Vthe Court,of St. James'B." Everybody thought he had been robtied'and''murdered, and his place was only, • not filledup because it.was;of no consequence. He was summoned, of, course, before the ■ Foreign Office'aTithoritieSj'but stuck to it. that he had been told to "walk if he liked,",and he .AacUiked. ... ' • r> ■-,"•' ! The "Portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire," purchased for £IO,OOO, and stjole from the exhibition in Bondr-street, is still advertised' as missing. The advertisement i 8 stated by. the cynical to contain three flaws. They don't believe—l. That, it was .the, portrait -of .the Duchess ; 2, that £IO,OOO was ever really i .given for" it ';'. and; 3j that it was everi stolen. This is worse than -the commentary upon; the usurer's statement trnit he but honest —"Wo' liesiri'threewords." ■'.■ ~ The Pope, by-the-bye, you will have heard, has* been so good as to .cause a requiem to be sung for the souls'of his-departed jenemies. One would, .almost think-he read Pickens' works, and taken asa model Mr. There is an unctuous hypocrisy l in thefeafet that reminds one. exceedingly,of. that gopd man. At' the same time I am afraid it is not all generosity' 'and - forgiveness' of- 'or 'he' would scarcely have the name of Mazzini with that' of Gavazzi, "for he mupt surely be aware that the former would have Ireserited that, even in, purgatory.. I really don't think this requiem ' business is going to any very great length in the way of forgiveness. : •As for me, I can't sing • but I never wiphed:iny ' deadliest enemy (even a critic) in any worseplace than heaven, when he was oiice dead, and gone; and I lay no particular (claim to generosity of spirit either. : Ts there no one at the elbow of the Holy Father, now that Antonelli is gone, to tell him that these iare-very shallow tricks? '■'■'• i- - j The sentence passed; upon Dr. Slade, _and against which he has appealed, has given almost universal satisfaction, I "but the people who coquet with these .spiritual humbugs pretend to fear that such persecution fan the flame of superstition. Why they have • not used this argument in favor of the :poor fortune-tellers all these; years T do not understand ; for if it is worth a farthing any vagabond who has been sent to prison for,tricking ■servant-maids out of their wages have, given rigour to the practice.. That it is high time something should be r done with, these " mediums," is evident, ;from ;the fact that a house is actually advertised this week as being suitable for persons' of this claps, being 5 "in the centre of a highly-spiritual neighborhood." , ,', .* j • ■'' :
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18770205.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 4952, 5 February 1877, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,481LONDON TOWN TALK. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 4952, 5 February 1877, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.