DIVORCE COURT.
Wednesday, November 29. (Before their Honors the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Johnston, Mr. Justice Gillies, and Mr. Justice Williams.) The Court of Divorce sat as above, and proceeded with the case of STANLEY V. STANLEY. Mr. Stafford again appeared for the petitioner, and called and examined Mr. G. E. Barton, barrister at law, who is also a duly qualified practitioner of the colony of Victoria, to give evidence as an expert witness as to the marriage law of that colony.A decree nm for a dissolution was granted on the usual terms. FORREST V. FORREST AND HAGAN. This was a husband’s petition for divorce. Mr. Barton appeared for the petitioner, and stated the case, - which had been adjourned from a previous sitting for the production of evidence taken by commission at Titnaru. The petitioner was examined at length in support of the case, and some correspondence was produced, the case being adjourned until Friday. The Court then adjourned until Friday, at three o’clock.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18761130.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4896, 30 November 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
164DIVORCE COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4896, 30 November 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in