Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVORCE COURT.

Mondat, November 20.

(Before their Honors the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Johnston, Mr. Justice Williams, and Mr. Justice Gillies.) The full Court for the trial of causes under the Divorce and Matrimonial Act sat as [above at 11 o’clock. CHANT V. GRANT AND BETHELL. Mr. Bell moved, on behalf of the petitioner, that the decree nisi in this cause should be made absolute. The decree was made absolute in terms of the motion. THOMAS V. THOMAS AND HAYES. Mr. Bell moved, on behalf of the petitioner, that the decree nisi in this cause should bo made absolute. The decree was made absolute in terms of the motion. SMITH V. SMITH AND KINO. Mr. Travers moved, on behalf of the petitioner, that the decree nisi in this cause should be made absolute. The decree was made absolute m terms of the motion. Mr. Bell applied, on behalf of Mr. Barton, that the cases of Forrest v. Forrest; on behalf of Mr. Stafford, that the case of Stanley v. Stanley ; and for himself that the case of Cann v. Cann and Howard, should be placed at the bottom of the cause list. Applications granted. GRACE V. GRACE AND AREPATA TE NGAHOA.

Dr. Duller moved for a decree for a dissolution of marriage in this case on evidence previously taken before his Honor Mr. Justice Gillies, and the issues submitted to and findings of the jury thereon. The petitioner was examined at length in support of his ease. In consequence of a difficulty arising as to the proof of service of the copy of petition npon the Solicitor-General, as required’ by the statute, their Honors adjourned the case until next day, Dr. Buffer in the meantime to prepare an affidavit of such service.

GRANT V. GRANT AND OHALLENDER. ; This was a petition by the husband fora dissolution of marriage. Mr. Allan appearing for the petitioner. ■ . The petitioner, Detective Jeffreys, of Auckland, and Mr. Thomson, of Kaiwarra, were examined in support of the petition. The Court granted a decree nisi without costs. CAMERON V. CAIIEEON. _ ' This was the wife’s petition for a dissolution of marriage in consequence of certain criminal proceedings previously 7 published. Mr. Allen appeared for the petitioner, who was, together with P. C. Ryan, of Forirua, examined iu support of the case." The Court granted a decree nisi. ■ The Court then adjourned until 11 o’clock next day. .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18761121.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4888, 21 November 1876, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
398

DIVORCE COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4888, 21 November 1876, Page 3

DIVORCE COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4888, 21 November 1876, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert