SPITTAL v. SPITTAL.
TO THE EDITOR., bjp' Sir,—ln your brief account of this case you state — " This was a motion for a decree nisi for judicial separation, on the ground of adultery. The case was heard in the Supreme Court at Nelson, and a verdict found in favor of the petitioner." On the contrary, the proceeding was for a dissolution of marriage. It was a hearing before the Full Court of the petition, and evidence, partly oral and partly on affidavit, in support of it. There was no trial at Nelson, no jury, and no verdict. The Court, upon the hearing, granted' the decree nisi. —Yours, &c, Hart & Buckley, Petitioner's Agent. Wellington, May 20.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18750521.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXX, Issue 4421, 21 May 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
114SPITTAL v. SPITTAL. New Zealand Times, Volume XXX, Issue 4421, 21 May 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.