Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Thursday, November 12., (Before J. C. Crawford, Esq., R.M.). VACCINATION. William Mitchell, for neglecting to get his child vaccinated within the time specified, was fined ss. and costs. Niueteenotherinformationsunderthe “Public Health Act, 1872,” were withdrawn. VAGRANCY. Two girls, named Charlotte Martin and , Emily Harris, who stated their ago to be under fifteen years, were charged with vagrancy. The constable who apprehended the prisoners found them in the Gymnasium building yesterday afternoon; and he had repeatedly seen the girls in the streets very late at. night. His Worship passed a sentence of ono calendar month, without hard labor, and expressed a hope that the prisoners’ morals would improve in-the meantime.»lnspector Atcheson thought the* girl Harris incorrigible. f ASSAULT. John Walden was charged by his wife; Sarah Walden, with assaulting her. She also , complained that her husband was a lunatic. His Worship dismissed the charges. Shortly afterwards Mrs. Walden applied for a summons against her husband for using threatening language towards her. On being called on the defendant denied the charge. His Worship again dismissed him with a caution, defendant promising to use his best endeavors to get along smoothly with his wife. ; - ' - • TRESPASS. Monk v. Longhurst. This was a case for trespass on the Makara highway, brought by the authorities of that district. The defendant ■ pleaded not fpiilty, but the evidence showed that a colt had been allowed to stray. His Worship said the offence was very trivial, and , fined the defendant 20s. and costs, the minimum penalty under the Act. CIVIL OASES. Collins v. Kinvague. A claim for repairs found to be necessary to promises which the defendant had recently vacated, and which had been leased by him from the plaintiff. An amount was paid into Court, for which sum His Worabip gave judgment.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18741113.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 4259, 13 November 1874, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
297

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 4259, 13 November 1874, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. New Zealand Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 4259, 13 November 1874, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert