Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION.

The.following interesting letter from the Colonial Treasurer has been handed to us for publication : “ New York, March 7th, 1871'.

“ Sir, —1 have the honor to submit to you a few observations respecting American railways, and to make a few suggestions which may be useful in New Zealand. Of course, Tdo not pretend that the suggestions have the value of those coming from an expert; or that they are anything more than might occur to any person travelling through the American continent, and when bore in mind that we are proposing to initiate in New Zealand the construction of a thorough system of railways.

“ There is a remarkable contrast between the estimation in which railways are held in this country and that in which they are held in New Zealand, or, as far as I am aware, in the Australian Colonies or in Great Britain. Just as we in New Zealand should think of constructing a road and metalling it completely, or metalling but a portion of the centre, or even being content with surface formation at first, according to the probable extent of the traffic; so in America is the freest discretion used in the construction of railways, which work is thought no more of than, if so much as, is thought of ordinary road work in the Colonies. Consequently, railways in every stage of completeness are to be seen here, from the roughest and slightest style of construction, suited only for light traffic and low rates of speed, to strong and perfect lines suited for much heavy traffic and high rates of speed.

“ One of the most remarkable and probably useful consequences of the popularity of railways in this country appears to me to be the absence of all necessity, for carefully shutting them off from the approach of all other kinds of traffic. It seems to be regarded as wholly unnecessary to fence or guard railway lines from the approach of.human beings. The sole object of fencing seems to be to keep off animals. Thus, through a great deal of country, where animals might stray or wander upon the lines, some sort of protection is provided ; but wherever road lines, highways, or streets have to be crossed, it appears to be a matter of course that the lines shall pass without any attempt being made to guard against accidents. In thinly peopled districts, and even in Jjpms, one constantly sees boards stuck tip, with the words * Look out for the locomotive ;’ but this even is not considered necessary where railways pass through towns, the ringing of a bell upon the engine being regarded as sufficient warning of the approach of each train. Through the most populous portion of *ome populous towns, the trains pass constantly ; and as you glide by you see men, women, and children, horses and carts, and other vehicles, waiting at each crossing until the street line shall be clear. Along some streets in Chicago, goods trains are drawn to and fro, for the purpose of shunting or packing up particular wagons; and although there is consequently often a delay of several minutes before the line can be crossed, the pedestrians and the drivers or riders who are stopped accept the delay as a natural and proper one. One night, on waking and looking out of the window of my berth in a sleeping car, I was amazed to find that we were running through almost the centre of a large town (Pittsburgh, as I afterwards learned). “ In Baltimore, an exceedingly populous city, and where the traffic is very great, and the streets are narrow, there is a distance of something like a mile and a half between the station which one reaches on the way to Washington, and that which is the station for booking or for New York; but instead of the passengers leaving the cars, or a heavy expense being incurred in constructing a viaduct or anything of the kind, rails are laid in the most direct line through the streets of the town, and long trains are drawn from one station to the other by four or five horses attached to each carriage. When it is considered that the two lines thus separated are amongst those which have the largest traffic in the country, that many fast trains are run over them, and that it would be practicable to construct a complete connection, though the cost would be considerable, an idea of the * railway policy/

as it may be called, of the United States can be gathered, that policy being to save expenditure by whatever seems to be the most convenient and ready method of doing so, and of dealing with each case upon its merits, without thought of precedent or rule. Further instances of this are afforded by the facts that out of New York, and out of San Francisco, the railway systems have to be approached by means of ferryboats. I am not able to suggest what would be the probable amount of the cost of overcoming the natural difficulties in the way of continuous railway transit in either of these cases. Probably, in the case of New York, the cost of a bridge would be very great indeed. But this I am able say. that the use cf the ferry-boats is productive of no inconvenience. The arrangements in connection with the ferry are such, as regards baggage, &c., that as little inconvenience is felt, as if passengers at once entered the railway cars. “ I am not setting down these isolated facts without an object. You must of course accept them for what they are worth, and understand that the observations are those of one merely passing through the country, without leisure to study the question, or special knowledge to enable him to do so thoroughly ; but I think that the observations will suggest this at least: —Now that we are commencing the construction of railways in New Zealand, we should resolve to construct them upon a basis not dissimilar to that adopted in this country : that is to say we should lay down as rules—(l) That railway lines shall be constructed on precisely that scale which is suited to meet the probable present traffic demands of the parts of the country in which the lines are to be constructed ; and (2) That the people of the colony will be sufficiently intelligent to protect themselves against accidents without continuous fencing of the lines, or the pecessity for costly crossings where the street lines or roads are intersected.

“ If I recollect rightly, on the Otago Southern Trunk Railway, from Dunedin to the Clutha, there is intended to be even yet some heavy expenditure for the sake of avoiding level crossings; end that where such crossings are contemplated, it is proposed to go to the expense of constructing gates and paying gatekeepers. This appears to me to be an imitation of the English system, without the excuse for it which is afforded by difficulties existing in England. For example, in passing a railway bill through Parliament enormous expense has generally to be incurred, and concessions in the direction of what is supposed to be for the protection of the public are readily granted, rather than that there should be discussion. In fact, costly road crossings are constantly adopted, for fear that some individuals might raise more costly objections than the lines proposed would be hindrances to traffic. Again, railways in England are mostly constructed for rapid traffic; whereas in New Zealand, as in America, I anticipate that the average rate of speed will not very much, if at all, exceed twenty miles an hour, and that there the same caje can be exercised in driving trains as is exercised here ; constantly, where curves are sharp or gradients steep, or roads or streets have to be crossed, there are small boards stuck up, with figures indicating the speed at which the trains are to pass. “If it be decided, as I think it should be, that people in New Zealand are to be familiarised with railways, and that they are quite as capable as any other people of protecting themselves against accidents from passing trains, it seems to me that costly crossings may be avoided. We may also follow the example of America in having the most simple of Stations; and further, we may decide that where great difficulties exist in crossing any river or approaching any town, there fog. a time at least, until the traffic warrants the' incurring of heavy expenditure, such expenditure shall be resorted to as, while entailing a large amount of inconvenience, will save a very considerable amount of expense. “ I am, &g, “ (Signed) Julius Vogel. “ The Hbn. the Minister of Public “ New Zealand.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18710527.2.31

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Mail, Issue 18, 27 May 1871, Page 15

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,459

RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION. New Zealand Mail, Issue 18, 27 May 1871, Page 15

RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION. New Zealand Mail, Issue 18, 27 May 1871, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert