Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

oars or poles in bailing matches, fouling, or not giving way in proper plaoo to \ cssels on opposite tacks, &c, &c. Clause jSTo. 8 declines " that any deviation from these rules will subject the aggressor to forfeit all claim to the prize." It does not follow that the penalties to which we subject ourselves in this world shall alwaysbe rigidly enforced without reference to, extenuating circumstances ; if it were so, few of us would escape whipping, and as I do not think that the " aggression" of can-) ing a Hag of a wrong colour accidentally, without any purpose of deception, is equal in enormity to the aggression of wilfully running foul of another boat, throwing out or taking in ballast during a race, or not giving way in proper place, I hold it not to be a just application of the law to visit them all with the same severe punishment. If, however, a boat is only to be distinguished by the flag, and if three boats distinguished by correct colours are essential to make a race, no race can be said to have taken place in this instance as only two boats so distinguished came to the post. Either then my boat was in the race or she was not : if being at the post bearing a flag differing from that under which bhe was entered, she was accepted without objection by Umpire, Committee, and the crews of the competing gigs, with a view to make up the necessary number for a race, she cannot, I think, be fairly disqualified upon an objection which existed before the start, and which bhould have been noted by the proper parlies at the time. If on the other hand the rule shall be interpreted strictly that three boats entered under certain colours and bearing these colours are required to make a race, then no race can have been run, and the prize should not have been given to any one. I therefore protest, as owner of the winning boat, against what I believe to be a partial and severe decision, and as a member of the Yacht Club, and a contributor to the funds of the Regatta, I protest against such an appropriation of the money as has been made in this instance. I am, Sir, Your obedient Servant, D. Pollen. Kawau, February 10th, 1852.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZ18520214.2.7.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealander, Volume 8, Issue 609, 14 February 1852, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
393

Page 2 Advertisements Column 2 New Zealander, Volume 8, Issue 609, 14 February 1852, Page 2

Page 2 Advertisements Column 2 New Zealander, Volume 8, Issue 609, 14 February 1852, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert