To Correspondents. The New-Zealander.
The letter of " Philo-Jletoikos" is not a reply to o»r coi respondent X, but r.nlier a complaint that he did not do (what .avowedly was not his object) — i.e. entei into a contioversy with " Metoikos" on the particular question to which that writer has duecinri hisatti'ntion. Had '' l'hilo-Meioikos" discussed, with a courteous avoiding- of personalities, the real points urged by X, we couid have had no objection to the insertion of his commtmicition; but as he meiply '' says ditto" to his fiiond " Metoikos," his letter •would find its more appropriate place in the columns of our contemporary, whence the thunder has gone forth of which " Plulo-Mutoikos" gives us the faint echo.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZ18511217.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealander, Volume 7, Issue 592, 17 December 1851, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
115To Correspondents. The New-Zealander. New Zealander, Volume 7, Issue 592, 17 December 1851, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in