Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

. Auckland— Tuesday, November 17th; 1846. '"- The Court sat this morning, when His Honor the Chief Jfistice gave judgment on the, following motions:- - ~ , Oa behalf of Wiluam tlA^slj_Esq.>?;-'.: : '' f r- The further declarations' filed in this fnattVr)?appjear td"me sufficient.^ 'I liey,sho\v that on various occasions MrrHalse- was 'consulted, and gave^advice qri^matters 'ofsbosiness- properly- belonging to *tliejprofession*-of,a" Sojicitor|/as/distiuct;as~Jro"m";tjiatr^6iife^ thrit^he Tlid not; action "tliese occasiquVgratuitously^and. merely;''as a'friehd of T th"e partie^cdns*(jltiug vhim'|vb(it that lie recei^ed'his-chargesfSs,^^ of a Solicitors! business." Havin^;i ? e|¥ro^§:"cjrcu"]n^ staifcesof the/settlemynt ofNew^PlyEoWtb^aftl^jtinj^ "an'd to.the amount o/jl egKl^bjusinels^li^eiyAto^arise/ihj it^ 1 consider it to.b\su&Hen*tJjfslipw^ s .liy|these^ecl^ rations that Mr. Halle liad^ iff"t|ie3tf nSsofJUe^ffgrerap .Court ' Ordinance- established^hijn^ejf^ii^&rexercise, of lii s 'profession , -on", oc '"beforeHhCaand, day; (Sfjp,ecem^ ber, i 841 C The^order tlierefpre^ w_ill^be^a# praxeclrCr**^

/The f Attorney GeneraV p. ;-This is.'a\suit upbnJa wHt of s«re a Gt'ivnt made*by "His Excellency : Kobert;-Fitzßoy;"-Esq.i Idiii' Governor - of- this -Colony, - tb^Jfctfe" 'defendant's fidfe qfii'tiairi: lands' situated "in Ithe,parisV^ofJK^a|^;Tl(e grounds -upon whicbT it v is /sbughtfto vtliiS) 6rant, are]^"^ . ;%/-^^^>" *^f f ':<;l.iThat;-the lamL comprised in the^Granttwas never' pfferecLfoiisale^by public -auction priojCtqltfe^date b£ 'the grant] as required by the^'Austiraliah^LandTSates -^iXC; Vict.'c?36. V-- ; ■~#~^'s*te&%> : ? y?£ . : 2,'- That the, consideration Vwas hot. paid J iir money ate required by 'the same statute : % and ' _\~ , : ' C.?\. X I -S. -That;the*-. said ' land was, not of in ; the i manner^ and~ according to the regulationsprcscribed byjbhe s_anie ; statute. , '" "V -^.'--c , z^cV\~~ ' <^ * -A.ro £tße declaration, the., defendants Jiave^dem'urr.ed^ an j^^the-matefiarpbiat^vhichi^thi/rCourt'is|calledfftpQn f jto^ecfdef fs tbis,4^ Wjh'ethef^G^ant^of;a*.ppJtion Sf tlw, lauds, of t]ielGr6VS]:hyiwa"y iof^excKatige^oMitlfefc i>alid,;.ndftvfthstaniJing>"tlfeVa?6l%aid/stat^ 'gi'dunds^ of demorfei^wrere -asstgiied ;^but|j^re^ai^^ af gumenT j^andTtbje defendants fa'skal? fo^Uie' .jt/difnieSl 1 of ftlie^ Court on. that point onlyjwliiclf-liaV jfeen-jusf now stated.;,-'. >*■;>^ "- . -. '! %'^%#^S^f; j-^iifisr-to"* be'^6bserve"dl,a.t J< the" outset,- (andjtis a yexylnaterial.observation) thattthe Graa|i[o%ii^qa^stip^Ur | 'alj&ed to have been made bytheGdveVnorin tK^niauie^ ,'oXtfieJJrowa ; not by the Crovm imaicdiately,^io'r yet by the -'Governor acting under any authbrityspedaiiy' jfalating to this transaction, but by the Governor'acting ,ia the name of the Crown, that is, in tluvexercise of the 'general, authority which, as Goyernor^hehas -received from the Crown ; jirid it is impeached," as being" an act in, which- the "lawful limits of that general- authority, Vere exßeSdedr^l^ *<*>' - r %'r^r^^t^ ■. A'udjndeerd, reason^for^cpn^ 3tdenng-this",,pfaht asbeingj inVj.hejs^tf ict andkp^pp'Br: slsn^e,_anlactpfthe"Cr6wriit£el^ in tiie.earli^r Jiistdryottfae." SriSslf GoloaieCdrfPlantd^ -tiorif (particularly' ia^ Nor v th--AlnerJga : |arrdytli e,T WTest fndies) where lands *sitaated~in^tl/o^e;-CJil.onies^;Wel% granted directly "and iininediately^by>th^Cj^|vn^lf" this brant were of suca a naCure); tlie^quirationTto jvhic^ the: afgunieat Jo'f ;tlie .defendants >ha>\-b7e|n '^jnryTdr dressea; would beaniateriai^d^^'l^llHipeXiad^vi tUe main point; I oaeiin the" qij sesJiojfj~'s,Whe^hiiCsj|ch' 5 esJiojfj~'5,Whe^hiiCsj|ch' % .G'rantlbtirnow. .sustainable of 4 I^!w^|»T^ vilid . exercise* ? o£ :^a- prerogatlv%stiU^abi(lingJ infthe*CfoVn^Untoifcfie'd byJthelL]and''Saj^^<^^J^aj|^iii4, GrTint^iio^undercouMde^ "aiiy thing upon" theae^plea^lig^'tolkai^'bWa^nyrsnSjr direct^ac.f;oi\ r Hter;;^ of au ollicer, pb3se3smgaia|eeljiig]i;po\mVas*th^Mire"ctg representative of.He^Majes^^ jret\who3e^ pnovfeTß^feT "(as\w)U be_seen)\leaned',ir*dd^stnctly=rjßgula^^ particular-respect by;aa>Act of : Parliainßnfct?^'^^^ r The real question thenVragpea/s^o^-be|.thersam^Ks" that wlncff arisba in. eVeiy.^aie^h%re,"lin;ag^ntja^;ia^ •perfdrnaed ah';a*c ; t' jntfie^nttlnejo^n^b'^lwlf-fof^hXs?^^^ cipal,' thefp rYncipal;afterwards"cd'nteiTds^th"atiKelis%ot > bound ther«b^.>Tlfafqaatiqa"is^ fol^n^-^B' aathorityl'under, whic)i- the; agea^actellf lawful, was the particular r ¥ct;Ja' v questira^iJiiu^ie!' scbpe/p'f "tH'-itauthority^VV^ai it an\ct^exp^rjrssly^!t|§|rj fzedjVor- -was it impriedtaml^myoivecf* in^somejitHer act r vvhicl3ilwa3 elcpres"slysauthori'zed^?*|^ -.; lu.tUis view of,the"caseKthe groun^d;of|Del^.ul^rJbrt| "which the^Defendants ;4'e'ctiy|!ly.aUegedj''andynde i ed."Vi^h"e v^ Sakenrstnctly) even to rkUe~aa^irrel^aat;^que^tipn#^ J3ut~oa tliLf i^ap;npt Jnsist % i't6x'^m sllchja^"case,.li||'crty: ,1» atnia d,- wo ald of course,be7gi yjßn.™^lfFegard|;tfie^de^ ,ni d trrer^as }i&\ ag^sq toTraise^bbthC'qSlijionss ! aod proceed to, cbnsider/th^reap^questiqa ,;befdfestfi^ '|b%t;u^o"ua^nimts^\™^^ 7;'The;pefendauts^Ken;adm]tftha%^ Stated iti^ t thV de^lkratiGnfas^grounils of^bbjectiqnit^'the' 'grant, are>Ju7iToTntM'f&ct^triU^ | that, upon thft'gro7nd,of coijfofmity to^heStatutefJthjS; frant:caanot be^sSataiuT'f j" bjit^tliey'sayitha^i^isltqlb'e] i sajteulaedra^;Vi a^P e Q4^ nt W t ' a^^° a^%^^y^^ JitatuteV;- --i>j'- _-{"„ ::-l*i^lXjf~~^~* r f :i^£^ is,said'thaf the^whole^ct Kas"npibearingTupon f the^ |We:; ,thafdt is;foh:|h|:face of itijan s A~c|:fo£regulating2 Sales'and'Sales 6nly:%thatatajdJ)J's s fnoffprdfe^s^§£efl 'gulate,ExcK'anffes>M I fie" l A^t'itli?~saidf-..de¥cri'btsJi^l^ as; -"-An Act ~^But x Tthe ]^ition\tffiis.^ Weratiol^df^sia€iite"iCt^6Vmjeatu^ •oftheititl^thereofr^isclea^la^eta^leWßfff^^ lSig*se^]tblftlieit4t|^fWJlQg|p^ noTpaft of t&eadfc itself j^dfthatlt^iw?*befallo^ed^ •to. limit 6r/cpntrbl,th&]^ t)peratL^par tjof ft«ScT.^Nb^tfetwpfdlof#eirop^ rative;partbntbisrHt^i !U Ki"Ac^l£e^6Ms^%th'f %&m and subs^tial^act&^'aTcCs^'plamf^uallil' "were'rib^easyrmatter^Brid^yithWsh^uld^ lit isjen'acted,(iri sec^rO-^HhatswthintthWAustralian 5 Tjoiedf of, in 'the^mannef and accprdjng.tatKe'regiilati^s; n^einafter r prescribVdlndJaot o^cru>wc^Andv(in s'e'c^ *£)I£< ,ThaVthp:,Walt|;^^^ traUanXCplonies^tfaU.nofiiiav^as hereinafte l rjis"«ce^tx/ |df(^mc¥excepti(ftfis^nojpart*"bfit^ - unj^er^cqnsideratidn) bb/c^ej/ie^^alim^d^Sy^Ler. MajfeSy'oFanypersori'brrpeHbnsiietragfonJthe^^^ qrVnderth6'aatKo*rity:of/HerfMaX«^

sunple or for any less Qstnti^wAntefestfunlmsudk'con-*: such sales be c6ridiicfedin^the?r)ianji'er"dttd cfccording'to ! 'tAeregulation3-yieriinafln'ros^ib^d?^-Torme'ttvese\ .words appear plain enough to preclude, all * doubt as to the intention bfJl.e;Legislatnre.:~-Tbe cons'tructibn.dfo^hich it^ ,thatthc large "and genel^ar%'ords"em^loycd>b^%the* Ler_ gislature really mean ,npthing^mqreithan~inC;" special! and limited wpfd '5 Sale}'.' is capatfleirf being easily dis- 1 posed by a simple 'substitution of this one word for the ifer ms:actually.u"sCdf : -Make *Jhe ; substitution , 2 and the enactments beconuTat once idlfe and unmeaning. 'l_thihk t he^e,arnefl,Attornev*Generarg'ave"a i gbod answerjo'this point, _ in ; saying that= .thefe^fo&ld^bj^mf thing,;in! the Defendant's argument it thSword|*Uia.d;stboditl{us "In all casesrbf sale the modelof "p^fdceedingrshall^b'e according to tjie.regulationyjiereinaftQr^preicribed''-n i .Words pf : thaksprt .would liave^shbwh" a;clc?r4ntention not to prescVib'e for bther.modcs.of^JienKtioriV^ M>£^r '.Further if the Defendants construction could _be A maintained and the whole.case 7 taken "but of the opefa-* tTqn oF the Statute, it would be still riecessa'iyVtot show, thatjthe power of granting crown lands bj_ way-of ci.-". change" was previously. vested- in theYGbvernor, "as"a 'part of l\i& general authority: „No\v-it as'rremarkable, that it* lias not" been .contended that s'ueh -was the case.; 4jid- indeed, considering" theipas§age"sfcitedat"the arguY Sneht fronithe J«, Charter^ a&d-the^. Royallnstriictipnl" if js'noteasy to see^liSw thiaf position could 'bfh main-, taufetl; % T- „- 1 '"" ' £-* . "" »' "- .-.--'' J '" -"* '"" ~'l -"- \r"> iT^YKatever be the effect of upon /.the. QuVnJs Prerdgative^wheth'er|he.words*be s.ufhcient-to i bin d ithe crdwn^or, not,l tappers^ulSfff t ; h'at ,tHey^are 1 suffi«eliit v to. b'm^any'ofn^ tip iipersohracting'bnithfsh'ehaltof unaefSfie^autlidfiW. "the^Crp wn.unless Juch > : .the^siatute'.t "1 1 is^ot'ne&ls^y^ojpulfsu"e;lthe^iuqyiry into, the Vubs^.qaen^sections^fetfi%acl^ a'(lmitted"that;theje^ulatjqn^lfer^ij^ yiidtjri thilihstance been ; compHe^^ilhVJ^l^^l^rA 1 *^~ It is also unecessaryto cpnsid^lt|^effS:^if^bhe^3rdr section,~whic|j;excepts cerfein3a^hd^o^ut^pflj^eSb^el«i|; tionioflth'e 'Act', for;-th{wilpK^defwidantilKve"pVi;fre7 fecord,"claiipedthe : benefat^^this r 6xcepUp)i^ also v was waived at the argument.;/ ;,^ ."— > f^ |?> -';| -_ tl ßjit- still further, if we Jpokj; beyond^ the -W£rd£ p*f/t}iis_-Ajdt£^^^ J;he;Whole loVAt^ the, casetxapjea4jtolme,to + be' v equallyj .^rb'n'g a"galn¥tjkl^ as^inxonstcumg;all4bther^Acts;i\vefare bound tofregardr jespecially^andjprimarilyrstherobjectcoflthelliegislature, r chief, .against which provision^asiherebyrtDiadl^iS^ g^ThereJs ,one'6bjec^expr^sly^ayq^d?in'lthe^pYe"a.m^ ble^namelv> , to^secul'e^raifonnity/in^tli^ilpdsaj^of' thi^thX'natuYe^3f-,the v system 5 wJiichiiTwas the wUI-'of 'tlie^l/cgibrature^d^caase to;b'e uniformly pursued for the future, should be distinctly and clearly stated; . ' -. > . . The' regulations to belaiddo'wn, were totguide the. Governors of all the Australian tli'e Governors, but the m Cblohilts^Th"ere}waj.-to be one-=body-of*ri'uleS' to ; which Ss . J;fie«i M leT ot^'w^Vnel^sary 3 |tu%n^th^atlt|i < e^ rules should- be' laid! dowffiinjplaia^oKls^aCdlthos^ words bes-taken^in^heir^plaiaJsease.^Any^ieviation? rqm that-obyiqus^s^Dse, jinless^orcepsupo_nj|he4Jou i ct. >)y,^he r n^^isity7pf^iYing^^fiepS^3i^^ tne*tP|hcr . 7 partsrOrrth@A^'(andJ^^l ufc h s^c^ssjty alppears) J f'woul3^be^'ia^fiiB^clSe'peSulitrly daagerous;-" twoiila tend^tojrerproduce^the^verfemischxerfAgamst -&MorebYer,,it'is;ipnip'ossible'Jdread-ahdi I consider;tliis" Act wjithonJi.seejng-thaJitheceis/anqther.princimeiWhich, has D^ea|gfeatly?rega?decl Bys't?>frorerKo™s^pnn s '' tlw.exclusion^o^ fub'je^inlCfdrJtheyutjirejjdfel^^ie^d^^ injthe' Colony to /a al^rigKt'f .in^thj" "pfo{)lesp'fYh"e2(^ldoy.^This^p^incip^ part : of l the l Ac't-^tße* niaiu*en£ctment* il|elf-spi'd'(fn^np' dlss^degree) {the^exception^ ou^of-^lia^'e'nact^en.t^ 4 A\cordinrg'to4heg§%eral'yiHeYT v »^^ utely e^cluldeJl^i^ptHe>s^lJojved V^yet !n^t r uDtil thj^aßd^tb^bes^^pr|^liiC-t]p^ jfcract has'b'een.bfferedw folv r s'alefby^ublic"?Ad'cti6ni*TS6 l niitne, exception ij- pu bl icj.benent|alpQe,'isjregarded i^tbe prlncfpleof ngh"t^n;evj^ inj^he "pne^se, Jit|is^a. e^fial/ng^ ple^s'esj'and^accdtdingittfthejnat'u^^ enjoyed Vlln^the/pthe^cA^Jit^isii^^q^ apprdpriate\the "enjoy meritS>/' r*""{v-?i'?"i' -'l-J %>lf tßeaV.this Act were "stiU-leaving. 'ranthd rjjy bMhe^'Gdye^or ,of| the^ Colony",- io*Slienate w VVaste^-Landsof 'thekCro wff ibfeway' of^excjiange, . and withojtfpubljc*cpmpetitionj!|this. tlwt* v ah'ciMt^nd\sbundriile:^whlclV'declalf^ r '£!the"diity,ofjthejJudgeg^at aUjiimej/tp'imaKeisuchrconiS slvacSoa'as^sniaiL'suppi^Vtl^misca'ief^nd^dvSbce'the"' /"Jt appears thenjlthat jthe^ffectrof^thisfstatut^isltb', ?e'nder- a graiit'of Cro wtfl^ffds^sucl^ffittH^'iejno wf iff 1 ; "quTsYibn^milawful a^W^ oKthe Q ueen's prerpgativeimayjsustainasuch^ar grant? orsny btheiygrant orlauds-withitfthisJLblonyVTnptwith-standlng;this;statute^Ho%fa^«ie|aecilioi|^^ iMifjted.bn^y;Mr/^hi^kerr;4migh^ case P^TKese -are *qifestibli^^ich|Ho^nbttanse|liere«. Whitaker^as^o^ertain , CrownjGrants^ssue.diimpursu;,, Wee J 6TFvinstrlictidns-'contai2^inWde^Stcu^ rntthttGroTs e r»f«irGfl 2 WeSfi^taiM»^^ nfistdnetwhic&l-'caiTndt'pTOpCTly^nter^itf^^^ think it^rightito:_saypthat*l|doJnoJcopcurSntn^the:i learned^ C^nsjeJ^inp'c^on«denng^feosejgranjts^^stand* "o^.ttie" sa'me,f6oling aSthe'bn^now^rfi^Veltioh.^r! l^^ i¥Upon the whole, after giving n most serious consideration tb.this matter, and^esinngttolact-iiFthe^ipintfof ,our;EnghshLaw,'wmch^seek^always»to£qmetfmensV titlesTfratherJthanrtoTshaketthem^rather^tohealHKin' tolwouud ; and, t hat " stdl^ more especialiy-incases*like t th«Tpresent^w;here thetgood^faithsofitjretpartaes^isgnot KrantTwas.maae"in~a»manner-contraf3Sto,bothjtheletter ? j a^d^pl&^S^irm^rialjA^^|,ja^b§§^o f nf adefCitis' iricumbe'nt bif'this'Court^tp "pr9erithe|same; i^l^have^tUe/saliisfactionJof'-kno'wihlrlthat'my^earded'

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZ18461128.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealander, Volume 2, Issue 78, 28 November 1846, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,190

SUPREME COURT. New Zealander, Volume 2, Issue 78, 28 November 1846, Page 1

SUPREME COURT. New Zealander, Volume 2, Issue 78, 28 November 1846, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert