Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WAR OF THE FUTURE.

In the first place human nature is ever the same, and the extent to which it can be modified, strengthened, and, in a word, improved for military purposes, is comparatively small. In the second place, both the opponents will possess practically equally efficient means of dealing forth death and wounds. In the third place, the figures of the range cannot be applied to the statistics of the battlefield without great deductions. One or both of the contracting armies would enter into action after a preliminary march in heavy order. The nerves and judgments of the combatants would be disturbed by the constant rain of bullets and the crash of bursting shells. The delicate operation of fixing the time fuzes would bo hindered by shaking hands and beating hearts. In short, the difference between firing at an enemy who does not reply and one who does, between firing at a silent foe and one who is firing at you would be very semiWy felt. . . . Though all statistics lead one to believe that the percentage of killed and wounded in an army will rather diminish than increase in the battle of the future, still there is no doubt that certain battalions, brigadoa, divisions, and army corps will in some cases be nearly annihilated. There is no absolute rule of combining the offencive with the defensive, and . . circumstances must dictate to a commander whether he shall assume the passive-defensive, the defensiveoffensive, or the purely offensive. Those, therefore, who so loudly extol the activeoffensive fail to see that the attitude of a commander must depend upon cireum. stances which the greatest ability cannot always control. .Subject to strategical considerations and the direction of the enemy's advance, they can choose and strengthen a strong pouition . . . can . . , . destroy cover for the enemy in his advance, and keep the assailants stationary under fire by wire entanglements, pickets, inundations, and other obstacles not easily destroyed by the attackers' distant artillery fire The defender can ascertain the ranges from all parti of tht position to spots likbly

to bo occapied or advanced over by tho enemy, and especially to all piobablo arfcillory positions. Finally, tho defender can, fioin tho nature of things, make better nrrangements for tlio supply of ammunition. — Edinburgh Review.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NOT18950424.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

North Otago Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8168, 24 April 1895, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
378

THE WAR OF THE FUTURE. North Otago Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8168, 24 April 1895, Page 3

THE WAR OF THE FUTURE. North Otago Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8168, 24 April 1895, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert