Friday, Feb. 20.
Mr. Cumming Bruce resumed the debate. He distrusted the promises that had been made of quiet upon the subsidence of the present anti-corn-law agitation; on the contrarr, he expected fresh confusion would hereafter be generated by the course which bad been pursued by Government upon the subject tefore the house. He, for one, should dissent against that doctrine, by voting against the proposal of Government. Mr. P. Scrope expressed himself in f ivour of the proposals of Government. Mr. Newdegate took exception to the maxim, that we ought to buy in the cheapest and sell in the dearest market in the worll. It might be applicable to the affairs of trade, but did not hold good when the government of a State was concerned. The conduct of Sir Robert Peel had been most dictatorial; and to the measure before the house he (Mr. Newdjegate) would give his hearty opposition. Mr. Babkly was in favour of the Government measure, deeming it to be an advance i
t owards a healthy fiscal system, warranted by j t he exigences of the country, and free from the c bjections which lay against precipitate change. Captain Bennett expressed his intention to \ ote for the amendment.
Mr. Muntz, though differing from every fection in the house, whether for or against free trade, yet concurred as heartily as any man i n the present measure. Mr. D'lsraeli congratulated Sir Robert 1 'eel upon the equivocal support he was about i o derive from the vote of Mr. Muntz. One point in the present confusion of events was ilear — her Majesty's Ministers had changed their opinions. He was prepared to prove that the system of protection was not the odious thing it had been designated. Sir Robert Peel liad condemned the spirit of party. What was party but the embodiment of public opinion ? fhe charge he had to prefer against the Minister was, not that be had paid too much deference to public opinion, but that he had outraged that opinion. It was monstrous to think of settling a great question by the influence of a heterogeneous mass of converts to policy but uot to principle. It would have been becoming Lord John Russell to propose a free-trade measure, founded upon his previous policy, but it came with ill grace from a minister like Sir Robert Peel to a policy of a totally opposite kind. The debate was then adjourned to Monday, the 23d of February.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NENZC18460725.2.8.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 229, 25 July 1846, Page 82
Word count
Tapeke kupu
412Friday, Feb. 20. Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 229, 25 July 1846, Page 82
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.