Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

The New South Wales correspone dent of the N. Z. Times writes : — The Town Hall scandal is of a progressivcharacter. When the foundation swindle has been fully exposed the city architect was instructed to examine the plastering of the rooms already completed. This task has been performed, and it has been elicited that the work , has not been done in accordance with the specifications, but that, on the contrary, while the lower portions of the walls (such as were within reach) had been constructed of the proper material, the ceilings and upper parts of the walls were of common mortar instead of cement. Some of the aldermen had . the hardihood to contend that although the work had not been executed in accordance with the specifications, yet it had been done in a manner which was customary with the trade. From this contention we obtain an insight into the manner in which the Corporation works have been performed, and from this insight we learn that tenderers who were in the secret were permitted to understand that the work might be done in a much inferior manner to that required by the specifications ; hence they were able to tender at much lower prices than the simpleton who supposed he had to be guided by the specifications. But, if any such simpleton had obtained the tender, somebody might have discovered earlier N that the specifications had not been complied with. The principal contractor for this disgraceful plastering is one who was an alderman, and who is still a very bright and shining light among the Good Templars and Orangemen. We have not yet done with the -matter, as three independent architects have been appointed to examine into and report upon the whole question of the Town Hall Buildings. The question as to the posture In which a man may place himself ia bis pew has been recently before an American court. An American jury has recently decided that John Dick, of Warsaw, New York, had a right to sit in his pew, ia the German Lutheran Church, with his feet elevated , upon the back of the seat in front of him. j -Pirated by R. Eke&& & Son, "Mail" Office, Nelabjj, i :

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18810528.2.17.10

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 126, 28 May 1881, Page 2

Word Count
368

Untitled Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 126, 28 May 1881, Page 2

Untitled Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 126, 28 May 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert