Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FRATERNITY.

( Wanganui Herald.) In the libel case of Griffiths v. Johnson, just heard at Blenheim, the evidence of one of the witnesses is so remarkable as to call for notice. A Mr H. P. Macklin appeared ia the wit-ness-box to swear to a conversation he had had with the defendant of a damaging nature. Macklin stated that he was master of a Masonic Lodge, and that plaintiff and defendant were members, and that in his position he had tried to arrange the differences between them. The evidence shows, on the contrary, that Macklin, who was in the confidence of both parties, conveyed to theaggrieved person alleged admissions of the defendant, and fomented the quarrel until the parties were involved in deadly litigation ; and then as the fruit of his duplicity Macklin appears in Court to swear to statements he alleged Johnson had made to himself in the confidence of private friendship. Macklin swore that he expostulated with Johnson about publishing the letter on which the action was founded, and that the defendant admitted it referred to the plaintiff. Then, to Macklin's chagrin, , the following letter was produced by defendant's counsel in Court : — " High School, October 2nd, 1879. Dear Johnson, — I have some recollection of telling you to make no apology to- , Griffiths. Do you remember me say- , ing bo ? — Your obedient servant, H. P. ; Macklin," Then counsel drew from him an admission of writing the followi ing letter : — " I do not believe that ! there is a libel nor ground of action, so i far as Griffiths is concerned. . . . Remember, my own opinion is that there is no libel, and that if there were the settlement protects everything and further, I do not believe Griffiths means to rake the affair up in Court." The following answers and questions place Macklin and his fraternal obligations in a rather lurid light : — " As a matter of fact, when the letter appeared did you not advise Mr Griffiths to bring an ac- , tion ? — I don't remember ; I am not i certain : in trying to settle the case I ■ got very angry with both sides. Did ■ you not offer Mr Griffiths financial assistance as against Mr Johnson or the writer of the letter ? — I have no memory of it. . Will you swear you did not offer Mr Griffiths financial assistance ? i I will not swear I did not. Did you 1 not offer to give Mr Johnson £10 or an IOU for. that amount ?-r-I don't remember." And so on, Referring to Macklin's conduct, Mr Travers did not exceed a fair commentary on ihe evidence when he said : " He (Macklin) wanted a scrimmage, there was no doubt of that, and, to prove the desire, he had ■ offered money, first to one side and then to ihe other. A capital plan, no doubt, to attain hie object. It reminded him ofthe Kilkenny cats. Mr Macklin reached out one hand and collared one party by the tail. Then he drew their tails together, knotted them, and chucked the two infuriated animals across a rail, where he left them to fight until nothing remained but the tails and a bunch of hair. . . . He was ai the bottom of the whole affair without doubt, exciting the one and inciting the other." This i might be thought amusing were it not . for the fearful amount of treachery and baseness which has been associated with a society whose principles and preGeptft are unimpeachable. There Burely ought to be some means of purging the society of men like Macklin. The pretence that*he was acting Masonically has only to be confronted by his own ad- " missions to show how great is the slur ' this man has cast upon the Order, or " rather how unworthy he is to be numk bered amongst its members,

Vxluablb Discovert for thh Hair.— l your Hair is turning grey or white, or Jailing of!, use « The Mexican Hair Renewer," for it tcill positively restore in every case Grey or White hair to its original colour, without leaving toe disagreeable smell of most 'Restorers.' It makes the hair charmingly beautiful, as well as promoting the growth of the hair on bald spots where the glands are not decoyed. Ask your nearest chemist for " The Mexican Hair Renewer," prepared by Henry 0. Gallup, 498, Oxford-streefc, London, and oold everywhere at Ss. 6d. per bottle. Advice to Mothebb I — Are you broken in your rest by a sick child suffering with the pain of cutting teeth ? Go at once to a Chemist, and get abcttle of Mrs Winslow's Boothing Syrup. It will relieve the poor pufferer immediately. It h perfectly harmless and pkassnt to taste. It produces natural quiet sleep, by relievirg the child from pain, and the little cherub awakes " ao bright as a button. It soothes the child, ie softens the gums, allays all pain, relieves wind, regulates the bowels, and is tha beet known remedy for dysentery and tliarrhcca, whether arising from teetlriag or other cairns. hold everywhere at is. ljd. per bottle. Manufactory 493, Oxford-Btreet, London. FtoaiLiKß I— For the Teeth &ii Breatb — \ few drops of the liquid ''Florilire" sprinkled on a wet tooth-brush produce a pleasant lather, which thoroughly cleanses the teeth from all parasites and impuitries hardens tho gums, prevents tartar, stops decay, "gh es to the teeth a peculiar pearly whiteness, and a delightful fragrance to tbe brpath. It removes all unpleasant odour arising from decayed teeth or tcbaccc smoke. " The Fragrant Floriltoe." being composed in part of honey and sweet herbs, is delicious tD the taate, and tho greatest toilet discover? o' the * ge. Sold everywhere fit 2s. 6d. Prepared ty Henry C. Gallup, 493 Oxford-street, London.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18810203.2.16

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 29, 3 February 1881, Page 4

Word Count
943

FRATERNITY. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 29, 3 February 1881, Page 4

FRATERNITY. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 29, 3 February 1881, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert