Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

To the Editor op thb " Evening. Maii,;"; Sir,— ln my opinion the resolution of the Council at their late meeting, condemnatory! of the action of one of their members rela-j tive to the state of the water supplied to the; city from the reservoir in Brook Street Valley, is as much : overdrawn by statingj that the Councillor's remarks "are entirely! without foundation " as ever anything said by that member could be called exaggerated; And why ? For this reaaon : that come few days before the charge was made, the water drawn fresh from our tap, for dinner ,> was totally unfitted for drinking, being colored greenish yellovr, and having an unpleasant smell. As a water-driokor for many years, I have ahva3's been of opinion that; pure water should be perfectly free from color, taste, or smell ; this was not the case on the occasion I refer to, as some ten orj twelve had to leave the dinner table on that day without their usual cooling draught. Inj part vindication of the member's remarks &i to the unclean state of the reservoir, I have' deemed it only my duty to send you this, 1 which, you may insert or otherwise as you think the merits of the case demand. : I am, Sir, Yours, &c, , ; Thomas Scott. . ! Trafalgar-street South, - ( Sep. 29, 1880. !

TO THE EDITOB OP THE " EVENING. MAI!/.") Sir,— l quite agree with your remarks that 1 the members of the City Council' took up an! extraordinary position when they constituted; themselves their own judges, and I ad-j mire the way in which they cut the Gor-i dian knot. by saying to this effect : " Allj men, or women either, who »ay not as we say are liars." There is, however, one piece of evidence which baß;evidently:misled,.ybu (aB I suppose it.waßintendedtp do),; and.iasj it was given, as would appear f rora, the ical-i cv atipp, after due consideration by the City! Surveyor, it might mislead othfrrsr^Eej

Surveyor says that: the fungus, if covering the whole surface and two inches thick, , would represent, 40 cubic yards. Auyoue who has ever seen such fungus knows that the thickness is represented by thread-like pendants about the thickness of a spider's web, millions of which would be required to represent, in cross-section one square . inch. At all events lam quite sure that you could easily hold a piece representing a surface of one square yard by two inches thick in the hollow of your hand.— l am, &c, . HA.L. Nelson, Oct. 1, 1880. . . „■

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18801001.2.11

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 233, 1 October 1880, Page 2

Word Count
416

CORRESPONDENCE. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 233, 1 October 1880, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 233, 1 October 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert