RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
[Eefore L. Broad, Esq., R.M.] Richmond Hill Silver Mining Company v. Gerald O'Halloran (Thames) —Mr Atkinson appeared for the plaintiffs, who claimed £38 2s 4d for calls due to the said Company together with interest.. Judgment was given for the plaintiffs with costs, £3 13s. Same Company v. Mr Hennelly (Thames). — In this case Mr Atkinson said the claim was a9imilar one, and for a like amount. Judgment for plaintiffs for £38 2s 4d and costs, £3 1 3s. Same Company v. Mowbray (Auckland). — The amount of the claim in this case was only for the Ilth and 12th calls and interest thereon, amounting to £6 ls 9d. The Clerk of the Court stated that he had received a telegram from the defendant, in which he stated that he paid the amount by cheque on the 6th March, 1879. Mr Atkinson concurring, His Worship adjourned the case for a week, that the defendant might give particulars as to whom tbe money was paid.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18800413.2.8
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 88, 13 April 1880, Page 2
Word Count
166RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 88, 13 April 1880, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in