Untitled

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XL, Issue 195, 9 August 1876, Page 2

At the Resident Magistrate's Court this morning the following cases were heard:— Phillips w.Shaw for £22: 9s 6d, amount d£ promissory note. Judgment ■ for .plaintiff- witn costs— Harley and bon v. Helps for £8 9s, and the same v. -Berry for 15s. Judgment in both cases for plaintiffs with costs.— Cann v. . Coburn for £4 10s. Judgment for plaintiff with costs .-rAdamson v. Nash for £$ llg 2d for goods supplied. Defendant paid £1 lis 2d, and stated that he had. already paid £7. This was denied by the plaintiff, and on the application of Bir Pitt for the defendant the case was adjourned. — Infield v. O Connell for £5. This was a fraud summons, judgment having already been given a fortnight since for the amount. Ordered to pay half next Monday, and the other halt on the following Monday.— Levestam w. Orr for £21 12s. This also was a fraud summons, and defendant was ordered to pay 10s a week, and, on failure to pay one instalment, the whole debt to become due aud payable, and on failure to pay that to be. imprisoned for one month. * . .*