CORRESPONDENCE.
To the Editor oi tsb .Nelson EyjJNiHO Maii, ; SiE,-^-The Examiner, ixx its^ldadingi article of torday, directs; ah attack a^ainrlt me and my late, candidaturie, "'pi which.' it rejoicss. oyer : my defeat aSiinyplving ; fa > ; grand principle. Although T think it hardly worth while to reply,, to a paper,, ;; wh.ich|haß.;prq^titu|ed. itself- .as ,jthe„ £xdminerY has done in .its issue, of November 7, 1 s ( tUl beg that you will alfo-^li^i^cli^'a f^w'ip^fks.^ JThe Examiner states that I was brought forward in the O'Conor^in teres*; and that" the result of yesterday's* election serves as a basis, upon which the resal^ of ,-th^ election for the Soperintendency' c4*n u fe : ' , calculated. that, result ... m ay oe> " time will show.' TW oditoV'of (ihe Examiner, , Btates r that : I was; . ostensibly, forward in the 6'Cdnor interest! . I beg to give the statement the most' unqualified denial, and I challenge him jto., the proof, is "there one word in ihose remarks which! addressed 1 tb' fhe 1 el^tdrs* ); tp his statement ? There is not. The editor of the Examiner, honors me, by 1 stating that my fellow-citizens fhtertaiu tjconsiderable respect for my.;ab[iity, integ- ' ritiy, and honesty of purpose. J i stated on ' thd day of nomination, that I would-be a warm supporter of • any progressiva measure; . by)what;rightidQeß.tbe editor °of •the Examiner novr question my- integrity by insinuating that I welulf " ollo*^; partyfeelicg to overrule that of ipurVgose for -yvhich f :|e has given me cfedit K I beUeye that YX jtossees, a :qraality 'beyond, • those with which I am .credited, natnely s: cfap poi^rage ,to sta^e my opinion fearlessly': anil truthfully,; Had ; J^ cou^e l forward for ; j? {h^ purpose affirmed, I would have' staled it ! unhesitatingly. ; ;I haye /stated . -frieolyf th^t I could not, after past, experience, "* Mr Curtis, butr nowhere have I avbwed^myaelf , MrO'Conor's^champion. ,. : . The re%ult of yesterdav's election >I consider highly fl^ribgf^i^y^dCi? sidering tbat I am untried lif poHtics,"thW' I never, like the other candidates, served the pubiic j^ ?oiy:'qap^)t^, ! I tha" fc 'I- Jssueof no address, and, fihatty, that I did not solicit or canvass for a. single; vote, ,'i >{ Yd jlf somo of my friends have exerted themselves on iny behalf, and if some^ of tbeir exertions have been iDiudiciQiis, a3 the Examiner states, I must^be permittod toibelieve that they were bot neafly^o^n--judicious nor damaging to me as the 1 'efforts of iliQ^ Examiner^ (^W'W^ November 7th) areto Mr -Curtis. Y \, I am, &c, , '""••'■ "H:"' A:' 'LE-via'sTiM.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18731112.2.8
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 272, 12 November 1873, Page 2
Word Count
405CORRESPONDENCE. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 272, 12 November 1873, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.