Page 4 Advertisements Column 3

Maoriland Worker, Volume 3, Issue 90, 6 December 1912, Page 4

j : ftCTto.

TUST ir» these eupferfluous , one*. Sick " are they always; they vomit their bile, and call it a newspaper.—Nietzsche. W' J. RALPH, to whom and family • belongs the freehold of Ralph's Taupiri mines, and who is a director, of the Taupiri Coal Slines, Ma., tfafigß tEtt Kβ has "the utmost contempt for' th« waster and agitator.' . This" (Mntempt for , the waster is thoroughly areciprocated by vs —thatfe why we have such an. inexpressible loathing for Ralph and his lend. npHE following cable was printed in A laet week's newspapers: "LA.WRENGB (Mass.), 26th Nor. Etfcor, a strike leader, and two alleged abettors were found notjjuilty of murder® it connexion wrEh the recent strike' riots'. The accused embraced and kieeed each Other after the verdict **$ Ini6ufi£&Ji There was tremendous interest tafeeh. in the feiaV' .This mtaei , th* aefliiitftal of Ettor, Giovannitti end Heywooai and repf resents another* triumph of deterainea agitation-. Long lire Industrial Unionton I A LTHOUGH the strike is "off" do net ■£*• lose eight of the importance of the police cases fit Waihi. Do" not fail tff read Holland's irepcTts—on the gpot for this paper. Although' -JMrbV Kennedy Was evidently got to Waihi ac a polio* move in police int&estfrHind not ,&PQ bona fid§ hte eiiauiMnfi* under the trying ordeal, for ordeal it was. If tU police- authority g«H coot free out of all- tfift btosinleis; tbte #orkew will rue it many a time' £h.i oft. Insist ok fin inquiry. ©PECIAL ate&irioJi iti cillM fo tEe two offioial documents appearing ili thHf issue. The manif€efco "t» the pWl* of New Zealand" presents portion of the cafl6 for a public inquiry" into the happenings of the Blac¥ Weelfjat Waihi and also deals o6gently vfith WalfiWs disgraceful oocupailcy of the oßirenial chair at the Evans' inquest. Intimations of interest ars also aiads, fifld sutir that the fund for Mre. Evans «Ad her cfiildrfeh will m*e? wiSi a r*a4f resnonse. The letter to all unions explains itself. npHEEB is no oth*r lnaii ii €fee A who comes upon the .eoeaie ac a coroner does, who has got aH the power he has," said Df. Sl'Arinur, S.M.; while conducting an inquest in Wellington. And yet, ft nm mfmm. mmm 6t m M«t&H6tt of lAbeuT 6.M the Wrffti in C(«ron# Walntitt Mβ W& &■ lowed to retain this exceptional &*#i* of power by officiating ii' ffiKiftjtottfrjlSk the late F. G. ByAiie. Hafl $8 elightest eparfc of eelf-wSpeteti' the feeling against him on £h% of the strikers and theif lr should have emphatically declines tto Jc| in the case in hie oorbnial course of action shduld have H8& AfeJ*fe ent to him from the moment that aw 4 for a coroner'e services arose. All Wβ can conolude is that his hide i* AS; M»* as the ehell of the nut wh'iefc Beiftti hi# name. N"O cnanfe v«tt?e couM t>l fr|sttfSs by the Justice Departmeli; <&&.$& gara to the inquest on the d*W»f»» ttiP* Evans, but in granting th* , ftppliftlfSit for a change of v*riui in a claid TO, Mr»-. Ellen Smith Against tne In#*eir|ill Wt ough corporation for J65000 diijSiiijSfe'ft respefet to th%' death of her nu*Mn% Fred Smith-, Mr. Justice WiUito&# #!4 the point that weighed m<ist ,:wSth hito was the fact that lh"e action, if trlid Jit Invercargill would have to M t*l#i tif a jury mainly tit locll giesses (each jurymM who wa* a could be objected to by the plaintiff)* and it was difficult to cay how a Mr trial could be Mi in I»t*rfofPl "Sur*ly the iMt&i at mm tii* WstfSi .it^wet wore equally as important: as in the lo>tRoing case, and th« reasons given by the judge of equal weight in one instance us in tho oth*r