Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Threshing Dispute.

Dear Editor, —This week I attended the Arbitration Court at the hearing of the application for interpretation of the Threshing Award. I now ask : Is the Arbitration Court really a Court of Justice of a burlesque pure and simple ? An award for the threshing mill hand was made in the early part of this year, and to the individual who understands " English as she is wrote," even by a Supreme Court Judge, the millowner was compelled to pay the cook. However, the " backbone " rose in all its might and power, and sought a special interpretation of their own—and got it, of course! When did the Court ever fail to favour the "backbone?" Echo answers : When ? One strange part of the decision is that the custom of the past was taken into consideration to such an extent as to make one imagine that former" custom is in itself sufficient to override even Arbitration Court award. It is also Avell to put on record here the " backbone's " classification of the " cook " in the scheme of Nature. The cook, said the

"' backbone,." is part of the food, and, therefore, has to be paid for by the men. How long are the country workers going to tolerate such, an anomaly? The "backbone" advises them to open their mouths and swallow the cook; I advise them to open their eyes and see what are the real aims and objects of the " backbone." Then they will see the necessity of uniting together, and raising their voice against the tribunal which up to the present has absolutely refused to give them justice at all. Country workers and all other workers should, as the outcome of these happenings, keep ever in mind the necessity of the permanent establishment of a strong labour journal, and I trust that they will support " The Maoriland Worker" in the future in a manner that will make it a complete and absolute success as a powerful organ to voice the wishes, and enforce the desires of the whole of the workers of this dominion.—Yours, etc.,

M. LARACY Christchurch, Feb. 18, 1911.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MW19110220.2.79.7

Bibliographic details

Maoriland Worker, Volume I, Issue 6, 20 February 1911, Page 21 (Supplement)

Word Count
350

Threshing Dispute. Maoriland Worker, Volume I, Issue 6, 20 February 1911, Page 21 (Supplement)

Threshing Dispute. Maoriland Worker, Volume I, Issue 6, 20 February 1911, Page 21 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert