Compulsory Home Defence

Manawatu Times, Volume 65, Issue 5, 6 January 1940, Page 6

Compulsory Home Defence

There lias been some comment expressed at our apparent change of policy, as seen in the editorial article of last Wednesday. Therein support was given to the principle of voluntary enlistment for overseas service in the current war. This attitude has been viewed by some readers as in contradiction to our past support of the principle of compulsory training. It is wished to clearly state that there is no change of attitude as regards this matter. We have for some years past advocated compulsory training for home defence and still do so. That is viewed as permanent policy, whether at peace or war. A condition of war is to be viewed as an emergency state. Overseas service is considered as a matter apart. In view of the limited number of men apparently needed for this Dominion to send overseas, no necessity is seen for compulsion. That being so, the desirability of voluntary enlistment may be given consideration and the method retained. Home defence, however, is to be viewed in a long-term manner for years of forgetful peace as well as years of war’s enthusiasm. Training, therefore, should be undertaken by every young man. Firstly, that he may be able to play his part in any emergency that may arise; secondly, we believe such training would benefit all young citizens, both morally and physically. On ethical grounds, no objection can be validly advanced to such a policy. On material grounds, it has all to commend it. Let Parliament decide wisely and enact compulsory training for home defence at the very next session.