Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Our Prison Numbers

(To the Editor). Sir, —It has been brought to the notice of the N.Z. Howard League that a misapprehension exists as to the significance of our excessive prison numbers. It is thought by some that the figures indicate an excess of crime. This, we believe, is a misapprehension. We are told officially, and wo gladly believe that there is little serious crime in New Zealand. What then is the cause of the disproportionate number of prisoners? The explanation offeree, by the Howard League (and we know of none other) is that the responsibility rests upon a penal policy of ready and long imprisonment. It is that policy which needs reform, and we feel greatly encouraged by the fact that, since our League drew attention to the com parative statistics, our courts have reduced by more than 500 the number of imprisonments for first offences. This has been done, let it be noted, without any subsequent increase in crime. Other factors have also contributed, and lately we havo been told that our daily prison population has decreased from over 1100 to 947. Though better, this is still too high. Had we, like England, abolished imprisonment for “sleeping out” and for non-payment of fines, etc., when poverty is the cause, our numbers would show a further decrease. If we should, like her, reduce the length of sentence, our daily average would soon approximate much more nearly to the 350 or so which is all, considering our advantages, it should bo. The latest English report shows that only 1.6 of those convicted during the year received sentences of three years or more,, while ou “preventive detention” (corresponding to our habitual criminals) she had but 116. Another more recent publication tells us that there are less than 2000 longterm men in her prisons. Our proportionate number would be less than 80 — yet of habitual criminals alone we had last year over 90. We repeat that it is our long sentences that contribute to our excessive prison numbers and not merely our yearly ‘‘receptions.** And if England can keep down her crime without these long sentences, cannot we, too? Again we urge that a full and open enquiry into our penal system should be made.—Yours, etc., NEW ZEALAND HOWARD LEAGUE FOR PENAL REFORM.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19370127.2.103

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume 62, Issue 22, 27 January 1937, Page 9 (Supplement)

Word Count
381

Our Prison Numbers Manawatu Times, Volume 62, Issue 22, 27 January 1937, Page 9 (Supplement)

Our Prison Numbers Manawatu Times, Volume 62, Issue 22, 27 January 1937, Page 9 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert