Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S

PAirMEESToisr, Thubsday, Oct. 16. : Before R. Ward, Es^ l R.M. ! J. Nathan.& Ce. y. T, Welspd— iplainV £5 0s 9d. Mrij3:. F, .Hawkins for plaintiffu. ...... i Mr J. H. Hankinß appeared to watch thi^ case on behalf of Mr Boon. • ; , H . W. Boon, deposed— l was formerly^ employed by Messrs.Nathan and Co, m the grocery department. -'■ On the ; d&ie mentioned Mr Nelson gave an order for goods' which • he ; requested' 'should' be inide up at once. When he came back, witness was writing out, .the account* Mr t>hortt added : up the" account while witness attended; tq spine other customers; Witness^ekedrjip :; the^ money which Mr Nelson laid down, and receipted the account. Witness f counted the money on placing iHh the tiltfahd found it was £21. iJNext morning MrrShortt- drew" his attention to tbe f «ct Jhat it :' shoujd have been Witness had not, add^d up the account, and consequently when he took the money did ' riot know ! the exaci amount. Witness said the!'receipt 1 could bs frdm< Nelson -andi then it would be seen where the f naisr ; take wa»i ■Mr Waldegravs: was m the shop w,hen ; the, money was paid. O/ S ; üb'!'; .sequ^ntly Mr . Nelson offered to j^ay ,the_, dt-ticiency rather, as he, said; than^ anybody "should suffer, 1 Mr^King : said he could not take it; as he had 'sent' pa'rtictilarßto Wellington. . .Mr Nathan stntup; a telegram to Mr Kong asking him jto' iftko proceeJiDgs againit iritoiw j

Nelson cal'e.l upon witness yesterday and said If© 'hajri been summoned for the amount. He said be would pay xt M be pid not ant to go to Court -md hare to pay all expenses. I did not seek Nelson; he iname'to me. In reply to Mr Kelson, witness said he heard him say to King and Shortt *t Was a dirty piece of work to send down the letterto Mr Nathan without saying a word to witness, and rather iban see him get into trouble he (Nelson) would pay tbe £5. Everyone ia the jtore had access to tbe ♦ill/but witness tbouffit no one but himself had been there on the day m question. H. Waldegrave deposed that on the 4th September last he was m the Ready Money Store while Nelson was there. Saw Nelson place a parcel of money, op the counter which was picked up'iby Mr Boon and placed m a drawer under the counter. Did not think' he counted it before placing it there. ■■■''> •-:-; In reply to defendant, witness said he did not tee defendant count the monfey before placing it on the counter. ; v! C. E. Shortt, clerk to Messrs Nafhan & Co deposed that on the 4th September Nelson came to the shop. Witnest saw. 'Mr Boon . making up .an count, which be : checked. . Witneit drew his attention to, a small error iniit. Witness went away tken. In the eyening on balancing the cash witness, found only £21 had been paid into Nelsbn't account. Called Mr King's ! attention toit. Mr Watchorn saw Nelson who said be had paid m £26 on the Thurt* day. Witness also saw Nelson who said he had pail id £26. Witness and Mr King went to Ashurst that ; evening; and obtained tie receipt from .Nelson, A report of the circumstances was for* warded to Mr Nathan. On the Mon» day morning; Nelson came and offered to pay the £5 if Mmßoou'was retained m his situation. He declined, to pojj it after Mr Boon had los»t> his situation. ■iNe'lsbtf said it wa« a dirty bit of work. lii reply to defendant witness said there had been "mistakes made m the shop previously. : '~ Witness had triafde mistakes himself. Had known Boon fqr 18 months, and had always fkhown him to lie honorable and straightforward though : liable to error. "...<,i '?,--'," ..James King, Manager of Ready Money Store deposed : — I was m ton on 4th September.. St Uements -wjjre made to me by Mr ; ; Short ; to, .the tffect that an amoeiit ' taken f romi' -Mr Nelson bad hot been passed-' through the day shook and the cash was L 5 short. On further enquiry found . that' : tKfe :<I |e« count was settled m fu I;- and' therefore need not have, been passedtbr^ngh'the day book. Witness, "cprroboraieoi the evidence, given. by .Mr, Shortt aS'fcoYth© subsequent proceedings, .and stated!, iljat on reporting the matter to Mr Naithan he received aitelegram stating that- from : tbe statements made he thought, Boon was; criminally liable, ; Nelson: offered to pay the money if-Boon was reinstated but declined to pay after Boon lost his situation- iN^eJson.said :he did not know whether he had- paid L2l or L 26 bat relied upon hisr; receipt. \ Witness be^ lieved Mr . Soon to be thoroughly 'honest..;..';'; r: : : '^f'.'-ijV'?.. v; " fl^ r T. Kelson depbseffthat on the day m (ju^tion -he went into -the store wit§ »tt order. Mr Boon jwas yery'bttayl''" 1 jiifter making out the account it was' checked by ( ]ytr "Sborrt/'Witfaess-'^cOujited out the. nioney and gafe 'it,.. to'^'Boon wh» ga vs a receipt. for } it. 'Next|^4y met Shprtt, waV said .something 'wafc wrong with, the account."' WiVrie's > r''t'dld him be (had not the receipt with him, but be« lieved '"he bad paidL26.' Gave the receipt to MessrsKing and .Shortt subsequently, Was af terwards^asked, whether. WcWld swear, as to .the 'amount he ''had paid j and said he . was, not sure. : " He'/ counted Ihe money before paying it, but might have made a"mistake,.. , /• '••; '^" >^:'^ ; In .(reply ., tp'.'./Mr. VHawkins-TOB'b'ftn placed the money m taetili'aftejr. taking it, Tothe best of his . belief Bobn counted it* . < , „ij At the request of the Bench Mr Boon wa,s recalled an j stated^ thafc'he ( ditf;i^t count the money when taken from I JNeJ» son. : SHad,:taken a.,. guinea^.'fojfj' flax which was also, placed m another part^ of , the. tiii- ; , ,1 ..;;/.;'; ..'"y.^'. r \ ."..,";,! ;Vr ; , His "S^orsbip.wiJs inclined to' tfcihlc tbatonly L2l bad been paid. He aid not think the mistake had been a wilful one Qn.the part of M!r NelsonI J .. Judg* mept was given for plaintiffs with Court costs only* ' '.. . J. P.; Heaton v : W, Weeks— Claim 12s. Judgment, was given for plaintiff, defendant's Fo?t, 4 being, also joined m judgmeuC !'*" ' _]'.'.,, '\ ' ( .\ r , . %x Siiisted,; v &., summons,, Lil td. v Mr 'Baker /|for Lpla^tijff.j ... P'ider made* for pa^iapnt forthwith, iv default 14'.daysl' ir ._;'/... 'j

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18841017.2.12

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume X, Issue 1323, 17 October 1884, Page 2

Word Count
1,044

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S Manawatu Times, Volume X, Issue 1323, 17 October 1884, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S Manawatu Times, Volume X, Issue 1323, 17 October 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert