Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ij CIVIL CASES. | i A iL i) ■ G.e\»fce': MT Snepjfon v. H^rauna Ngapua. — This was agntfgment summons Jolt; £1.8. , , Delettdant acknowledged the debt, apd proii>u.ed. to^ ,pay a) ' er the Rising, of, tti» Lands Court/which would be%ab'6At : a fortnight. Mr. Snelson eSpres"ed b'l willingness. to. gife^t^me," "and an order was made for theipayment on the lTtiibf October. , # ■ yoy* '['. William Ele'ards v'J J; C. ? Ghristienseo. —Claim, £1 19s. Mr* Staite appeared for the plaintiff, .Defendant acknowledged : : the debt, but stated that he bad a set-off, and also intended to bring a case for .breach of contract^' Judgment'fbr'pifcintiff. with costs. | t William PeaTdg(,Vijljouis Poison. — ' Clai.^. £<*] 4s. Mr. Staitjp fotrpla'iWuT.i De '.ndant acknowledged the debt, but stated, that timers were so bad h^.jya^ unable to pay it. Judgrpept for amount claimed.' '"' ' [i - ::H ' UYI ■' • j /William Deai?ds>v. iWtftiam Movtensen. —Claim, £13 19s. Defendapt-jadiDi/tMd i havingi got- sbnie gboS#''f'rrim 'the plaintiff, bat a^he had jbook lie coul"d iJ isiit J dispnte the correctnesg of tjhevaccoiHikJudgment for the TamountT iMr. Staite appeared for. the plaintiff. Gundersen t. Joseph Heaton — Qlaiin £llbalanc« due ." | a suit of Volunteer clothes. Mr Perk ms 1 Sppe'M' fo/the plaint'ff ; defendant did ( ''not ;i 'pui l m .an appearance, and jud^m unt wentgbjj,; dt^ult.^^ > „,.,,, Ee.er l!^ikklesen f «v. Andrei J^Dsmr'*— 'Cla?m. £4ios. MVTerkins fc r plaintiffs JVltj Hawking -far <*efen/tenj. Wh^'tnie 'case " v iame" ' beFore^ the ( on tlyrrjthel ,'defendant c lsald ; ' l ne?aid l Hdt ]'k to fljbt with a woman, andswould therefore y iij .t)ie^o^y;r-V^p: r 9Jx \ *»"* "« I ' 3 1 ' 'PetM-'/Schelot ' 'v. JB^^j^nMn f £remuD.e»)i ■^-GJaiiinL.ie^ for trespassf^fttenj-Jbjead o£; J chltrei : '; : jtf'r'Peryins appeared i of. plainMiff. 1 irtS WBtM ffi{ts.MeaMm; arid (be ca&e occupied a cohsldei'-ablie trm^, and ■ ju{3grn€nt?fras e*toitually gir^a_.&r..thft. defendjan.^..<r I Gfb'^e^Theak v. Alexnndtf M'lV|frinJ( — This was a claim ( for jgS- IQi for wages l; to the; plkintjff^fSri §eryiQes_imdered. Accordingjto the e\ idjancp of.Mr. Th«ak, ( he bad eDgaged by ocPendant "as' bbok-keeT^, jcanv.itser, , and ppl^ectorj at the rate of £l 10s, at wbicH K Wage"he was to go oi? ; month. -'s4* the end of the fifs^SWtik .^eftsjOatife ,«i?oteia>*e«er'rb I plaintiff, expjesslpggrpat at his captb'liticij and iaumatiDg that fron thatdatca ' is services" as book-keeper wpild bedispeftsid!^ith;' f iiut' i; hi he might sill coatiaue aud occapy Knwel^at whafc r >: ever ie couldl be i tHefal. The defendant p*?d_£2 m o- court, £1 16s for jfonrdays; jthe; aecond- wfceK Lbf f#>?vi?e, 'atta^^ibii* 1 sbillriss law expenc-.s, b4^- cjmiid^ed , plaintiff was, np.t .entitled to a ppany for., vthe' fii'st Week v or? account of h^i i^oomv 11 petency.. The ph'ntlff /sailed [John B. Bungari, Who-statiaWtt Mr. TJieak had been -"a bit. employ, as b«ok-ke*pe>,. and had fauud him m-^fe correqt prpon'ali'oci ' «aiio*«,iai* pbtt^witkJbimJwith^ejcref ;;: looked upon him aa amost efficient Uoolc-' keej:r, arid 1 one who 'ttiorougblV understood newspaper w^rk.L -Th'e'B&c^ con6xdered,that tte,ca»e,of incompeljency was proved, and affowea 10s for the week. J udgmentufoßithaii amount beadfe %hat had been paid into court, and costs.,-/;* «r P. Collins r. R'ohard Partridge.— Claim, £1 19s, Mr. Hawkins f«r plain-

tiff. Defendant did sot appear, and » judgment exparte was giren. Same v. and Davey.— Claim, £5 10s. Mr. Hawkins for plaintift. \Defendant did ntt appear, and judgment went by default. Bqbeit Walker v. T. Tricker.— Claim, (iiß2.--.t"^tr. Perkins for plaintiff; no appearance ef defendant; (judgment m default. '-/ V' JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. "Anderson v. O'Malley.— -Mr. Hawkins appeared for the plaintiff, and stated that he had received a letter from defendant prqmisjug Jo pay in^a month. He did not want tcT press him", Tsut inasmuch as .hejje.'had made similar promises before, which he had failed to keep, he would ask-tfie'Be^cß^to malke m order forthwith, with the understanding that it snould.oot be put m force for that time.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT18811001.2.9

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume V, Issue 163, 1 October 1881, Page 2

Word Count
610

Untitled Manawatu Times, Volume V, Issue 163, 1 October 1881, Page 2

Untitled Manawatu Times, Volume V, Issue 163, 1 October 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert